Resistance to the Soviet Centralization (or Takeover) of Ukrainian Cinema 1920s–1930s

Abstract This article is situated within the framework of new historical studies on the former Soviet republics and their successor states, adopting a perspective from these states rather than the traditional approach of “Soviet studies,” which treated the USSR as a centralized entity that could be understood from centre. To this end, it combines institutional and individual perspectives and focuses on the transitional period of the 1920s and 1930s, during which the Ukrainian film industry was integrated into a Moscow-led centralized system, before brutal repression muted protests. By drawing on recent scholarship, the author accesses archival sources. Yet instead of considering resistance as a local manifestation of opposition to central authorities, the article regards it as a process. The first section traces the gradual transformation of the independent VUFKU into Ukrainfilm, followed by its subordination and centralization, highlighting techniques of institutional resistance that occurred on several levels. The second section examines the trajectories of Ukrainian film directors, revealing individual forms of resistance – whether through stylistic or thematic choices, or as mere survival strategies. The article underscores the analytical potential of this period, aiming to open a field long caught in a “double blind spot” between the (post-)Soviet and European studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Affairs
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/humaff-2025-0098
Primary Topic
Soviet and Russian History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Resistance to the Soviet Centralization (or Takeover) of Ukrainian Cinema 1920s–1930s

Лариса Миколаївна Наумова
Human Affairs
Soviet and Russian History
article

Resistance to the Soviet Centralization (or Takeover) of Ukrainian Cinema 1920s–1930s

Лариса Миколаївна Наумова
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article is situated within the framework of new historical studies on the former Soviet republics and their successor states, adopting a perspective from these states rather than the traditional approach of “Soviet studies,” which treated the USSR as a centralized entity that could be understood from centre. To this end, it combines institutional and individual perspectives and focuses on the transitional period of the 1920s and 1930s, during which the Ukrainian film industry was integrated into a Moscow-led centralized system, before brutal repression muted protests. By drawing on recent scholarship, the author accesses archival sources. Yet instead of considering resistance as a local manifestation of opposition to central authorities, the article regards it as a process. The first section traces the gradual transformation of the independent VUFKU into Ukrainfilm, followed by its subordination and centralization, highlighting techniques of institutional resistance that occurred on several levels. The second section examines the trajectories of Ukrainian film directors, revealing individual forms of resistance – whether through stylistic or thematic choices, or as mere survival strategies. The article underscores the analytical potential of this period, aiming to open a field long caught in a “double blind spot” between the (post-)Soviet and European studies.

Human Affairs
Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Art History (CZ)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Soviet and Russian History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.