Assessing safeguards against the illegal wildlife trade on AI platforms

AI platforms, while offering many positive applications, also present new risks to society, including the facilitation of trade in threatened and illegal wildlife. Although these platforms employ safeguards to block harmful or criminal requests, studies show such protections are imperfect and can be easily bypassed. To better understand these risks, we investigated the potential for AI platforms to enable wildlife trafficking, evaluated their safeguards, and tested how easily those safeguards might be circumvented. We applied a test set/case methodology based on three prompts across seven AI platforms (plus a Google earch) for 20 taxa. Further, we analyzed the outputs based on four emergent themes: statements of legality, conservation status, suggested substitutions, and welfare concerns. Overall, AI platforms performed better than a standard Google search at preventing potentially illegal wildlife trade, with the highest overall scores for Gemini, closely followed by DeepSeek, Grok, and ChatGPT. However, AI platforms were not infallible, as observed when a prompt was given in an attempt to circumvent the platform's safeguards, which resulted in links to potential websites trading in possibly illegal wildlife. However, AI platforms provided additional information, particularly on legality, that informed would-be consumers. The strongest safeguarding responses were seen for charismatic taxa such as slow loris (Nycticebus spp.), chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes), and tiger (Panthera tigris), whereas the weakest responses were for taxa that are less charismatic but of equal concern, such as corals, tarantulas, and orchids. This finding may reflect societal and political interests, given that AI platforms based on large language models are trained with online information. Although AI has the potential to provide a route for consumers to purchase illegal wildlife, platforms currently appear to provide additional information to would-be consumers, allowing them to make a more informed purchasing decision than they would with a standard Google search.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conservation Biology
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.70400
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Assessing safeguards against the illegal wildlife trade on AI platforms

Jason R. C. Nurse, David Lindsay Roberts
Conservation Biology
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
article

Assessing safeguards against the illegal wildlife trade on AI platforms

Jason R. C. Nurse, David Lindsay Roberts
article en

Abstract

AI platforms, while offering many positive applications, also present new risks to society, including the facilitation of trade in threatened and illegal wildlife. Although these platforms employ safeguards to block harmful or criminal requests, studies show such protections are imperfect and can be easily bypassed. To better understand these risks, we investigated the potential for AI platforms to enable wildlife trafficking, evaluated their safeguards, and tested how easily those safeguards might be circumvented. We applied a test set/case methodology based on three prompts across seven AI platforms (plus a Google earch) for 20 taxa. Further, we analyzed the outputs based on four emergent themes: statements of legality, conservation status, suggested substitutions, and welfare concerns. Overall, AI platforms performed better than a standard Google search at preventing potentially illegal wildlife trade, with the highest overall scores for Gemini, closely followed by DeepSeek, Grok, and ChatGPT. However, AI platforms were not infallible, as observed when a prompt was given in an attempt to circumvent the platform's safeguards, which resulted in links to potential websites trading in possibly illegal wildlife. However, AI platforms provided additional information, particularly on legality, that informed would-be consumers. The strongest safeguarding responses were seen for charismatic taxa such as slow loris (Nycticebus spp.), chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes), and tiger (Panthera tigris), whereas the weakest responses were for taxa that are less charismatic but of equal concern, such as corals, tarantulas, and orchids. This finding may reflect societal and political interests, given that AI platforms based on large language models are trained with online information. Although AI has the potential to provide a route for consumers to purchase illegal wildlife, platforms currently appear to provide additional information to would-be consumers, allowing them to make a more informed purchasing decision than they would with a standard Google search.

Conservation Biology
University of Kent (GB)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Assessing safeguards against the illegal wildlife trade on AI platforms — Jason R. C. Nurse, David Lindsay Roberts · Conservation Biology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS