Unified Technology Readiness Level (TRL) advancement criteria for space nuclear systems

Abstract A unified set of TRL criteria for space nuclear systems, including nuclear electric propulsion (NEP), is presented, reconciling definitions and differences found in NASA, U.S. Department of Defense (U.S. Department of War (DoW) [as of 5 Sept 2025]) (DoD), and U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) guidance documents. The intent is to provide a common framework for consistent TRL assessment across government agencies and industry partners, thereby reducing ambiguity, limiting overstatement of readiness, and supporting programmatic decisions for advancing space nuclear technologies toward flight readiness. Detailed definitions are provided for each level from TRL 1 through TRL 9, with accompanying explanations and examples on the intent and evidence that should be presented to demonstrate advancement. Definitions and explanations emphasize hardware fidelity, software maturity, integration level, environments, lifetime considerations, and validation against analytical predictions and modeling and simulation results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Electric Propulsion
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44205-026-00224-7
Primary Topic
Technology Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Unified Technology Readiness Level (TRL) advancement criteria for space nuclear systems

Kurt A. Polzin, Andrew L. Presby, Roger Myers, F. Curran et al.
Journal of Electric Propulsion
Technology Assessment and Management
article

Unified Technology Readiness Level (TRL) advancement criteria for space nuclear systems

Kurt A. Polzin, Andrew L. Presby, Roger Myers, F. Curran, Dasari Venkateswara Rao, Natalia A. Tenenbaum
article en

Abstract

Abstract A unified set of TRL criteria for space nuclear systems, including nuclear electric propulsion (NEP), is presented, reconciling definitions and differences found in NASA, U.S. Department of Defense (U.S. Department of War (DoW) [as of 5 Sept 2025]) (DoD), and U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) guidance documents. The intent is to provide a common framework for consistent TRL assessment across government agencies and industry partners, thereby reducing ambiguity, limiting overstatement of readiness, and supporting programmatic decisions for advancing space nuclear technologies toward flight readiness. Detailed definitions are provided for each level from TRL 1 through TRL 9, with accompanying explanations and examples on the intent and evidence that should be presented to demonstrate advancement. Definitions and explanations emphasize hardware fidelity, software maturity, integration level, environments, lifetime considerations, and validation against analytical predictions and modeling and simulation results.

Journal of Electric PropulsionVol. 5(1)
Marshall Space Flight Center (US), Glenn Research Center (US), Idaho National Laboratory (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Technology Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.