Do No-Surcharge Rules Increase Effective Retail Prices?

Abstract In this paper, we determine how a no-surcharge rule (NSR) affects effective prices in retail markets (prices that include payment rewards for consumers). This question is fundamentally related to policy, and we address it by considering how effective prices respond to multiple payment methods and different surcharging rules across a range of retail market structures, which we capture through a conduct parameter. We find that when a no-surcharge rule is applied, effective prices in a particular market are often higher across all payment methods. In this case, the no-surcharge rule protects a double marginalization effect where the premium payment method inserts an additional margin that harms all consumers and all merchants, and this loss in welfare can be rectified by allowing merchant surcharging across payment methods. Our qualitative conclusions hold across retail market structures, while the closed-form characterizations that support them are derived under uniform consumer values, together suggesting that NSRs are generally harmful (except for payment companies).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Network Economics
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/rne-2026-0030
Primary Topic
Digital Platforms and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Do No-Surcharge Rules Increase Effective Retail Prices?

Takanori Adachi, Mark J. Tremblay
Review of Network Economics
Digital Platforms and Economics
article

Do No-Surcharge Rules Increase Effective Retail Prices?

Takanori Adachi, Mark J. Tremblay
article en

Abstract

Abstract In this paper, we determine how a no-surcharge rule (NSR) affects effective prices in retail markets (prices that include payment rewards for consumers). This question is fundamentally related to policy, and we address it by considering how effective prices respond to multiple payment methods and different surcharging rules across a range of retail market structures, which we capture through a conduct parameter. We find that when a no-surcharge rule is applied, effective prices in a particular market are often higher across all payment methods. In this case, the no-surcharge rule protects a double marginalization effect where the premium payment method inserts an additional margin that harms all consumers and all merchants, and this loss in welfare can be rectified by allowing merchant surcharging across payment methods. Our qualitative conclusions hold across retail market structures, while the closed-form characterizations that support them are derived under uniform consumer values, together suggesting that NSRs are generally harmful (except for payment companies).

Review of Network Economics
University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US), Kyoto University (JP)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Digital Platforms and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Do No-Surcharge Rules Increase Effective Retail Prices? — Takanori Adachi, Mark J. Tremblay · Review of Network Economics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS