Process‐informed co‐optimization of liquid air energy storage and data centers under off‐design thermodynamic operation

Abstract The rapid growth of AI data centers (AIDCs) is intensifying stress on power systems and exposing operators to volatile electricity markets. This work develops a process‐informed co‐optimization framework that integrates liquid air energy storage (LAES) with AIDC operation. Unlike black‐box storage models, the proposed formulation captures LAES thermodynamics through charging start‐up dynamics and off‐design discharge behavior, linking process efficiency with dispatch decisions. The model is formulated as a mixed‐integer program with a robust extension for joint participation in energy and reserve markets. Results across CAISO, PJM, and ERCOT show that LAES–AIDC integration reduces operating costs by 9%–50.9% in energy markets and up to 66.1% when reserve services are included. The analysis reveals that optimal operation is governed not only by price signals but also by maintaining LAES near efficient thermodynamic regimes, with AIDC workload flexibility shaping demand to support process performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AIChE Journal
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.70663
Primary Topic
Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Process‐informed co‐optimization of liquid air energy storage and data centers under off‐design thermodynamic operation

Jiaze Ma, Hui Geng, Xiaopo Cheng, Zhicong Fang
AIChE Journal
Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
article

Process‐informed co‐optimization of liquid air energy storage and data centers under off‐design thermodynamic operation

Jiaze Ma, Hui Geng, Xiaopo Cheng, Zhicong Fang
article en

Abstract

Abstract The rapid growth of AI data centers (AIDCs) is intensifying stress on power systems and exposing operators to volatile electricity markets. This work develops a process‐informed co‐optimization framework that integrates liquid air energy storage (LAES) with AIDC operation. Unlike black‐box storage models, the proposed formulation captures LAES thermodynamics through charging start‐up dynamics and off‐design discharge behavior, linking process efficiency with dispatch decisions. The model is formulated as a mixed‐integer program with a robust extension for joint participation in energy and reserve markets. Results across CAISO, PJM, and ERCOT show that LAES–AIDC integration reduces operating costs by 9%–50.9% in energy markets and up to 66.1% when reserve services are included. The analysis reveals that optimal operation is governed not only by price signals but also by maintaining LAES near efficient thermodynamic regimes, with AIDC workload flexibility shaping demand to support process performance.

AIChE Journal
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), City University of Hong Kong (HK), Nvidia (United States) (US)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.