Hearing Intervention for Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment

Importance Hearing loss is a significant modifiable risk factor for cognitive decline, but the effectiveness of hearing intervention for cognition stabilization or improvement still remains controversial. Objective To investigate whether hearing intervention could reduce dementia-level impairment incidence in older adults with coexisting hearing loss and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Design, Setting, and Participants This multicenter, parallel-group, open-label randomized clinical trial was conducted between September 2021 and February 2024, with the 24-month follow-up completed in February 2026. This study was conducted at 3 tertiary otology outpatient clinics and 3 CHOICE cohort community health stations in Shanghai, China. Of 21 908 adults aged 60 years or older assessed for eligibility, 703 participants with coexisting MCI (Clinical Dementia Rating [CDR] global score of 0.5) and moderate to severe hearing loss were enrolled and randomized. These data were analyzed from February 2026 to July 2026. Interventions Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive either hearing aid intervention (n = 353) or hearing care education (n = 350). Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was the conversion rate from MCI to dementia-level impairment over 24 months, defined as a CDR global score 1 or more. Key prespecified secondary outcomes comprised rate of cognitive improvement (CDR = 0) and CDR global and domain scores. Results Among 703 randomized patients (mean [SD] age, 74.53 [7.16] years; range, 60-96 years; 250 female [35.56%] and 452 male [64.44%]), 610 (86.77%) completed the trial. No significant difference was observed in the primary outcome, in which the conversion rate from MCI to dementia-level impairment was 3.09% (95% CI, 1.62%-5.74%) in the intervention group vs 4.74% (95% CI, 2.60%-8.29%) in the control group (risk difference [RD], −2.07%; 95% CI, −4.74% to 0.61%; relative risk [RR], 0.59; 95% CI, 0.25-1.38; P = .23). Meanwhile, prespecified secondary analysis demonstrated that hearing intervention increased the rate of cognitive improvement (15.34%; 95% CI, 11.84%-19.62% vs 2.36%; 95% CI, 0.99%-5.22%; RD, 12.00%; 95% CI, 8.79%-15.21%; RR, 5.94; 95% CI, 2.46-14.37). No study-related adverse events were reported. Conclusions and Relevance In this study, among older adults with mild cognitive impairment and coexisting hearing loss, a hearing aid intervention did not significantly reduce the incidence of dementia-level impairment at 24 months. Trial Registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: ChiCTR2000036139

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JAMA Neurology
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2026.3395
Primary Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Hearing Intervention for Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment

Hao Guo, Mingliang Xiang, Yunqian Ma, Jiayu Sun et al.
JAMA Neurology
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
article

Hearing Intervention for Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment

Hao Guo, Mingliang Xiang, Yunqian Ma, Jiayu Sun, Dongye Guo, 盛海斌, Tianyuan Zou, Xueling Wang, Zhentao Wang, Zhili Wang, Andi Zhang, Yun Lin, Jingwei Lai, Qiyue Shen, Hua Zhao, Dongzhen Yu, Yiming Zhong, Kun Han, Yuanyuan Xu, Feifan Zhao, Sijia Xu, Jie Chen, Wen Lu, Anxian Wang, Guangyu Liu, Qiongfei Yu, Mingchen Deng, Zaichao Wu, Ruotong Wang, Zhengyu Shi, Jie Liu, Ran Cao, Jinju Xu, Ning Su, Lian Jin, Qian Wan, Xue Wang, Huaiwen Cao, Xia Li, Ye Pan, Huipeng Li, Weiyi Peng, Jing Nie, Yilin Shen, Yimin Zhao, Yuan Fang, Haibo Shi, Yini Li, Qi Qiu, Mengping Wang, Jiali Yu, Jiawei Feng, Bin Ye, Quan Zhou, Shijun Wang, Yunge Gao, Hao Wu, Yuqi Jiang, Wentao Shi, Lei Guan, Yanmei Feng, Haiya Wang, Ying Sun, Shixing Qian, Jin Zhou, Jin Li, Yiyuan Fu, Shengqi Chen, Weihua Hu, Shaowei Zhang, Yun Li, Rong Tian, Ying Chen, Yiwen Zhang, Jing Feng
article en

Abstract

Importance Hearing loss is a significant modifiable risk factor for cognitive decline, but the effectiveness of hearing intervention for cognition stabilization or improvement still remains controversial. Objective To investigate whether hearing intervention could reduce dementia-level impairment incidence in older adults with coexisting hearing loss and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Design, Setting, and Participants This multicenter, parallel-group, open-label randomized clinical trial was conducted between September 2021 and February 2024, with the 24-month follow-up completed in February 2026. This study was conducted at 3 tertiary otology outpatient clinics and 3 CHOICE cohort community health stations in Shanghai, China. Of 21 908 adults aged 60 years or older assessed for eligibility, 703 participants with coexisting MCI (Clinical Dementia Rating [CDR] global score of 0.5) and moderate to severe hearing loss were enrolled and randomized. These data were analyzed from February 2026 to July 2026. Interventions Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive either hearing aid intervention (n = 353) or hearing care education (n = 350). Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was the conversion rate from MCI to dementia-level impairment over 24 months, defined as a CDR global score 1 or more. Key prespecified secondary outcomes comprised rate of cognitive improvement (CDR = 0) and CDR global and domain scores. Results Among 703 randomized patients (mean [SD] age, 74.53 [7.16] years; range, 60-96 years; 250 female [35.56%] and 452 male [64.44%]), 610 (86.77%) completed the trial. No significant difference was observed in the primary outcome, in which the conversion rate from MCI to dementia-level impairment was 3.09% (95% CI, 1.62%-5.74%) in the intervention group vs 4.74% (95% CI, 2.60%-8.29%) in the control group (risk difference [RD], −2.07%; 95% CI, −4.74% to 0.61%; relative risk [RR], 0.59; 95% CI, 0.25-1.38; P = .23). Meanwhile, prespecified secondary analysis demonstrated that hearing intervention increased the rate of cognitive improvement (15.34%; 95% CI, 11.84%-19.62% vs 2.36%; 95% CI, 0.99%-5.22%; RD, 12.00%; 95% CI, 8.79%-15.21%; RR, 5.94; 95% CI, 2.46-14.37). No study-related adverse events were reported. Conclusions and Relevance In this study, among older adults with mild cognitive impairment and coexisting hearing loss, a hearing aid intervention did not significantly reduce the incidence of dementia-level impairment at 24 months. Trial Registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: ChiCTR2000036139

JAMA Neurology
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), Ruijin Hospital (CN), Shanghai Mental Health Center (CN), Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital (CN), Collaborative Group (United States) (US), Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital (CN), Shanghai Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine on Ear and Nose Diseases (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.