Carbon Pricing and Coal Displacement in the European Union: Complementarity Between Price Signals and Phase-Out Commitments, 2005–2024

Whether the European Union Emissions Trading System has influenced the composition of electricity generation remains contested, and the evidence rests largely on aggregate European time series in which carbon prices and clean energy indicators rise together. We show that this design cannot separate a price effect from a common trend: in EU-27 data for 2005–2024, a linear time trend alone accounts for 98 per cent of the variation in renewable electricity, and the allowance price loses all explanatory power once a trend is included. We therefore construct a panel of the 27 Member States over 2005–2024 and identify the effect of carbon pricing from differential exposure, interacting the common allowance price with national fossil generation shares measured over 2000–2004, before the system existed. Three results follow. Carbon cost pressure displaces coal: a one-euro increase in the allowance price reduces the coal share of generation by 0.138 percentage points per unit of pre-ETS coal exposure, and this estimate is robust to country-specific linear trends. The effect is fuel-specific, operating through coal exposure but not gas exposure, as the difference in carbon content implies. Carbon pricing has no detectable effect on renewable deployment; the estimate is a precise null that excludes effects of more than roughly ±0.15 percentage points. Finally, the coal effect is conditional on the policy framework: it is −0.200 in Member States that had adopted a national phase-out commitment by 2019 and statistically indistinguishable from zero elsewhere, with the difference significant at conventional levels. Carbon pricing and phase-out commitments appear to function as complements rather than substitutes, with direct implications for the design of price floors and the extension of emissions trading to jurisdictions without national exit trajectories.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energies
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/en19194605
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Carbon Pricing and Coal Displacement in the European Union: Complementarity Between Price Signals and Phase-Out Commitments, 2005–2024

Kateryna Nahirska, Sylwester Bogacki, Sylwia Skrzypek-Ahmed, Oksanа Liashenko et al.
Energies
Climate Change Policy and Economics
article

Carbon Pricing and Coal Displacement in the European Union: Complementarity Between Price Signals and Phase-Out Commitments, 2005–2024

Kateryna Nahirska, Sylwester Bogacki, Sylwia Skrzypek-Ahmed, Oksanа Liashenko, Павлова Олена Миколаївна, Павлов Костянтин Володимирович, Wolowiec Tomasz, Roman Romaniuk, Nazarii Semenov
article en

Abstract

Whether the European Union Emissions Trading System has influenced the composition of electricity generation remains contested, and the evidence rests largely on aggregate European time series in which carbon prices and clean energy indicators rise together. We show that this design cannot separate a price effect from a common trend: in EU-27 data for 2005–2024, a linear time trend alone accounts for 98 per cent of the variation in renewable electricity, and the allowance price loses all explanatory power once a trend is included. We therefore construct a panel of the 27 Member States over 2005–2024 and identify the effect of carbon pricing from differential exposure, interacting the common allowance price with national fossil generation shares measured over 2000–2004, before the system existed. Three results follow. Carbon cost pressure displaces coal: a one-euro increase in the allowance price reduces the coal share of generation by 0.138 percentage points per unit of pre-ETS coal exposure, and this estimate is robust to country-specific linear trends. The effect is fuel-specific, operating through coal exposure but not gas exposure, as the difference in carbon content implies. Carbon pricing has no detectable effect on renewable deployment; the estimate is a precise null that excludes effects of more than roughly ±0.15 percentage points. Finally, the coal effect is conditional on the policy framework: it is −0.200 in Member States that had adopted a national phase-out commitment by 2019 and statistically indistinguishable from zero elsewhere, with the difference significant at conventional levels. Carbon pricing and phase-out commitments appear to function as complements rather than substitutes, with direct implications for the design of price floors and the extension of emissions trading to jurisdictions without national exit trajectories.

EnergiesVol. 19(19)
Loughborough University (GB), Lutsk National Technical University (UA), University of Economics and Innovation (PL), Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University (UA), AGH University of Krakow (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.