Numerical Investigation of Cavitating Flow in a Diesel Injector Control Valve Using Large-Eddy Simulation and Different Cavitation Models

Cavitation flow inside an injector control valve significantly affects the injection performance and operational reliability of diesel engines, and the selection of turbulence and cavitation models is crucial for accurately predicting cavitating flows. To evaluate the predictive performance of different model combinations, a numerical model was established based on the Winklhofer microchannel experiment. Three large eddy simulation (LES) subgrid-scale (SGS) models were coupled with three cavitation models, and their performance was assessed by comparing the predicted outlet mass flow rate, centerline pressure distribution, and cavitation distribution with the experimental results. The results show that the outlet mass flow rate increases with the inlet–outlet pressure difference. When the pressure difference reaches approximately 70 bar, the growth rate decreases significantly, indicating the onset of typical cavitation-induced flow choking. Under low pressure differences, the prediction results of different model combinations are generally similar, whereas significant discrepancies are observed under high-pressure-difference conditions with intense cavitation. In terms of mass flow rate prediction, the Dynamic Smagorinsky + FRP model combination shows the best agreement with the experimental results in the pressure difference range of 70–85 bar, with an error of 3.06%. For pressure distribution prediction, the Dynamic Smagorinsky + FRP and Smagorinsky + FRP model combinations exhibit relatively smaller errors than the other combinations. The cavitation distribution results indicate that, compared with the LES subgrid-scale model, the cavitation model has a more pronounced influence on the extent and evolution of the cavitation region. Overall, the Dynamic Smagorinsky + FRP model demonstrates the best comprehensive predictive performance. Furthermore, this model was applied to the simulation of cavitating flow in a two-dimensional injector control valve, and the predicted results agree well with the visualization experiments. The present study provides a useful reference for the numerical simulation and structural optimization of cavitating flows in injector control valves.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energies
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/en19194592
Primary Topic
Hydraulic and Pneumatic Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Numerical Investigation of Cavitating Flow in a Diesel Injector Control Valve Using Large-Eddy Simulation and Different Cavitation Models

Jingbin Liu, Zhenming Liu, Tao Nie, Li Luo et al.
Energies
Hydraulic and Pneumatic Systems
article

Numerical Investigation of Cavitating Flow in a Diesel Injector Control Valve Using Large-Eddy Simulation and Different Cavitation Models

Jingbin Liu, Zhenming Liu, Tao Nie, Li Luo, Tianyi Yu, Xingyu Qu, Mei Li, Ping Chen, Liting Li
article en

Abstract

Cavitation flow inside an injector control valve significantly affects the injection performance and operational reliability of diesel engines, and the selection of turbulence and cavitation models is crucial for accurately predicting cavitating flows. To evaluate the predictive performance of different model combinations, a numerical model was established based on the Winklhofer microchannel experiment. Three large eddy simulation (LES) subgrid-scale (SGS) models were coupled with three cavitation models, and their performance was assessed by comparing the predicted outlet mass flow rate, centerline pressure distribution, and cavitation distribution with the experimental results. The results show that the outlet mass flow rate increases with the inlet–outlet pressure difference. When the pressure difference reaches approximately 70 bar, the growth rate decreases significantly, indicating the onset of typical cavitation-induced flow choking. Under low pressure differences, the prediction results of different model combinations are generally similar, whereas significant discrepancies are observed under high-pressure-difference conditions with intense cavitation. In terms of mass flow rate prediction, the Dynamic Smagorinsky + FRP model combination shows the best agreement with the experimental results in the pressure difference range of 70–85 bar, with an error of 3.06%. For pressure distribution prediction, the Dynamic Smagorinsky + FRP and Smagorinsky + FRP model combinations exhibit relatively smaller errors than the other combinations. The cavitation distribution results indicate that, compared with the LES subgrid-scale model, the cavitation model has a more pronounced influence on the extent and evolution of the cavitation region. Overall, the Dynamic Smagorinsky + FRP model demonstrates the best comprehensive predictive performance. Furthermore, this model was applied to the simulation of cavitating flow in a two-dimensional injector control valve, and the predicted results agree well with the visualization experiments. The present study provides a useful reference for the numerical simulation and structural optimization of cavitating flows in injector control valves.

EnergiesVol. 19(19)
Naval University of Engineering (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Hydraulic and Pneumatic Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.