Comparative characteristics of live and inactivated vaccines against salmonellosis in animals

Abstract The aim of this review was to summarise data on the clinical efficacy, immune responses, and epizootiological significance of live and inactivated vaccines against salmonellosis in animals. The methodology included the systematic selection and qualitative assessment of 25 publications issued between 2014 and 2025 and retrieved from international and national scientific databases. The inclusion criteria were direct comparison of vaccines; the presence of control groups; and quantitative data on clinical status, humoral and cellular immune response, and bacterial shedding. The results showed that live vaccination significantly reduces the frequency of clinical signs: diarrhoea – 15.3%, hyperthermia – 12.1%, depression – 10.2%, and reduced appetite – 9.8%, with fewer local reactions. The level of specific antibodies by optical density reached 0.74 on day 60 after live vaccination; inactivated preparations provided a faster response – 0.67 on day 14. Cellular immunity, as indicated by the lymphocyte stimulation factor (LSC), and the titre of anti-salmonella antibodies are twice as high in animals that received live vaccine, which indicates a more pronounced and prolonged activation. The frequency of bacterial shedding in faeces on day 14 was 12.4% in the live vaccine group, compared to 24.9% in the inactivated vaccine group and 53.1% in the control group. Contamination of the skin and environment was also reduced by 2–4 times. These data confirm the high epizootiological efficacy of live vaccines in conditions of dense animal husbandry. Nevertheless, inactivated preparations remain important in schemes where the use of live forms is limited, especially in booster cycles. Inactivated vaccines are most effective when used in sheep farms that are free from salmonellosis, while live vaccines are most effective in farms that are not free from salmonellosis. A rational combination of vaccines allows protection to be adapted to specific production conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
CABI Reviews
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1079/cabireviews.2026.0044
Primary Topic
Microbial infections and disease research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Comparative characteristics of live and inactivated vaccines against salmonellosis in animals

Эльвира Башенова, Assiya Mussayeva, Batyrbek Aitzhanov, Saltanat Mamanova et al.
CABI Reviews
Microbial infections and disease research
article

Comparative characteristics of live and inactivated vaccines against salmonellosis in animals

Эльвира Башенова, Assiya Mussayeva, Batyrbek Aitzhanov, Saltanat Mamanova, Aigul Dossanova
article en

Abstract

Abstract The aim of this review was to summarise data on the clinical efficacy, immune responses, and epizootiological significance of live and inactivated vaccines against salmonellosis in animals. The methodology included the systematic selection and qualitative assessment of 25 publications issued between 2014 and 2025 and retrieved from international and national scientific databases. The inclusion criteria were direct comparison of vaccines; the presence of control groups; and quantitative data on clinical status, humoral and cellular immune response, and bacterial shedding. The results showed that live vaccination significantly reduces the frequency of clinical signs: diarrhoea – 15.3%, hyperthermia – 12.1%, depression – 10.2%, and reduced appetite – 9.8%, with fewer local reactions. The level of specific antibodies by optical density reached 0.74 on day 60 after live vaccination; inactivated preparations provided a faster response – 0.67 on day 14. Cellular immunity, as indicated by the lymphocyte stimulation factor (LSC), and the titre of anti-salmonella antibodies are twice as high in animals that received live vaccine, which indicates a more pronounced and prolonged activation. The frequency of bacterial shedding in faeces on day 14 was 12.4% in the live vaccine group, compared to 24.9% in the inactivated vaccine group and 53.1% in the control group. Contamination of the skin and environment was also reduced by 2–4 times. These data confirm the high epizootiological efficacy of live vaccines in conditions of dense animal husbandry. Nevertheless, inactivated preparations remain important in schemes where the use of live forms is limited, especially in booster cycles. Inactivated vaccines are most effective when used in sheep farms that are free from salmonellosis, while live vaccines are most effective in farms that are not free from salmonellosis. A rational combination of vaccines allows protection to be adapted to specific production conditions.

CABI Reviews
Kazakh Scientific Research Veterinary Institute (KZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Microbial infections and disease research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.