Responding to prison suicides: The penal state and evidence-based policymaking

How do political elites in the penal state affect what goes on inside prisons, and can evidence-based policymaking reduce the toll of prison suicide in England and Wales? I begin by theorising the penal state, and draw attention to the formally hierarchical character of penal policy and prisons, where political elites officially possess vertical authority to rule in a top-down manner. I then set out the realities of penal policymaking, and argue that the penal state in practice has a limited ability to command and control prisons from the outside, including in relation to prison suicides. Finally, drawing on elite interviews with former members of The Ministerial Council on Deaths in Custody, I suggest that this public body shows the weaknesses of two different models of governance, concluding that evidence-based policymaking often struggles in contentious fields such as penal policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social & Legal Studies
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09646639261491971
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Responding to prison suicides: The penal state and evidence-based policymaking

Dominic Aitken
Social & Legal Studies
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
article

Responding to prison suicides: The penal state and evidence-based policymaking

Dominic Aitken
article en

Abstract

How do political elites in the penal state affect what goes on inside prisons, and can evidence-based policymaking reduce the toll of prison suicide in England and Wales? I begin by theorising the penal state, and draw attention to the formally hierarchical character of penal policy and prisons, where political elites officially possess vertical authority to rule in a top-down manner. I then set out the realities of penal policymaking, and argue that the penal state in practice has a limited ability to command and control prisons from the outside, including in relation to prison suicides. Finally, drawing on elite interviews with former members of The Ministerial Council on Deaths in Custody, I suggest that this public body shows the weaknesses of two different models of governance, concluding that evidence-based policymaking often struggles in contentious fields such as penal policy.

Social & Legal Studies
University of Edinburgh (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Responding to prison suicides: The penal state and evidence-based policymaking — Dominic Aitken · Social & Legal Studies (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS