Modeling Techniques for Evaluating the Redundancy of Composite Steel Tub Girder Bridges Subjected to Brittle Fracture

Abstract Twin-girder bridges have historically been classified as nonredundant due to the perceived inability of the bridge to support the required vehicular loading if one of the girders were to fail. Although this classification is likely appropriate for twin I-girder bridges, twin-tub girder bridges have been shown to possess significant redundancy even with the failure of a girder. Advances from previous studies have induced the Federal Highway Administration to permit redundancy to be demonstrated through analysis in the failed state. The analysis requires a simulated fracture in a girder with applied loading consisting of the bridge self-weight and live load. Bridge models in the failed state require a relatively fine mesh and complex loading application, demanding significant computational resources and analysis run times that can require weeks to complete even on a powerful computer system. This paper outlines the development and validation of computational modeling methods for evaluating the redundancy of twin-tub girder bridges subjected to brittle fracture. The computational framework employs implicit and explicit algorithms to capture the respective cases of the construction sequence, fracturing of a girder, and application of vehicular live loads. While an implicit algorithm is advantageous for evaluating behavior during the construction phase, the adoption of an explicit algorithm is indispensable for analyses involving fracture, since implicit algorithms are not well-tailored for cases with severe material and geometric nonlinearities. Ensuring accuracy in both modeling and analysis techniques requires validation, which was completed using full-scale experimental results from a twin-tub girder bridge fracture test. Redundancy analyses are demonstrated on three existing bridges that include both straight and curved geometries. Modeling efficiency is improved and demonstrated by varying multiple parameters. In particular, results elucidate the efficacy of mass scaling and damping in reducing the computational effort. The techniques and recommendations dramatically improve the efficiency of the analyses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jbenf2.beeng-8265
Primary Topic
Fatigue and fracture mechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Modeling Techniques for Evaluating the Redundancy of Composite Steel Tub Girder Bridges Subjected to Brittle Fracture

Michael D. Engelhardt, Mojtaba Aliasghar-Mamaghani, Matthew H. Hebdon, Sunghyun Park et al.
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Fatigue and fracture mechanics
article

Modeling Techniques for Evaluating the Redundancy of Composite Steel Tub Girder Bridges Subjected to Brittle Fracture

Michael D. Engelhardt, Mojtaba Aliasghar-Mamaghani, Matthew H. Hebdon, Sunghyun Park, Todd A. Helwig, Xiaoyi Chen, Jeonghwa Lee, Aidan Bjelland, Loveleen Loveleen
article en

Abstract

Abstract Twin-girder bridges have historically been classified as nonredundant due to the perceived inability of the bridge to support the required vehicular loading if one of the girders were to fail. Although this classification is likely appropriate for twin I-girder bridges, twin-tub girder bridges have been shown to possess significant redundancy even with the failure of a girder. Advances from previous studies have induced the Federal Highway Administration to permit redundancy to be demonstrated through analysis in the failed state. The analysis requires a simulated fracture in a girder with applied loading consisting of the bridge self-weight and live load. Bridge models in the failed state require a relatively fine mesh and complex loading application, demanding significant computational resources and analysis run times that can require weeks to complete even on a powerful computer system. This paper outlines the development and validation of computational modeling methods for evaluating the redundancy of twin-tub girder bridges subjected to brittle fracture. The computational framework employs implicit and explicit algorithms to capture the respective cases of the construction sequence, fracturing of a girder, and application of vehicular live loads. While an implicit algorithm is advantageous for evaluating behavior during the construction phase, the adoption of an explicit algorithm is indispensable for analyses involving fracture, since implicit algorithms are not well-tailored for cases with severe material and geometric nonlinearities. Ensuring accuracy in both modeling and analysis techniques requires validation, which was completed using full-scale experimental results from a twin-tub girder bridge fracture test. Redundancy analyses are demonstrated on three existing bridges that include both straight and curved geometries. Modeling efficiency is improved and demonstrated by varying multiple parameters. In particular, results elucidate the efficacy of mass scaling and damping in reducing the computational effort. The techniques and recommendations dramatically improve the efficiency of the analyses.

Journal of Bridge EngineeringVol. 31(12)
Utah State University (US), Texas Tech University (US), Kongju National University (KR), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Fatigue and fracture mechanics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.