Systematic Determination of Distribution Constants in Deep Eutectic Solvent–Organic Solvent Biphasic Systems: A Quantitative Database for the Rational Extraction of Bioactive Compounds

Abstract This work determines distribution constants (P) for 19 bioactive compounds (flavonoids, phenolic acids, alkaloids, and glycosides) in biphasic liquid–liquid systems. The systems comprise a deep eutectic solvent (DES) based on choline chloride with urea, malonic acid, or L-lactic acid as one phase, and ethyl acetate or 1-octanol as the organic phase. Measurements were performed at 25.0 ± 0.1 °C and ambient pressure using HPLC-UV analysis. Apparent distribution constants (logP) range from about −3.4 to +2.8, depending on DES composition, organic solvent, and solute hydrogen-bonding functionality. For most solutes, distribution constants are higher in ethyl acetate/DES than in 1-octanol/DES, with differences from less than 1 order of magnitude to over 2 orders of magnitude. Notable exceptions exist; for example, chlorogenic acid partitions less into ethyl acetate for certain DES compositions, and sinapic acid with ChCl–U gives a higher value in octanol. The P values, expressed on a molality basis, provide a quantitative thermodynamic basis for rational design of selective extraction processes, replacing empirical solvent screening with a predictive, data-driven approach. For quinic acid, ursolic acid, rutin, and apigenin, distribution constants could not be determined in some systems owing to low solubility or undetectable concentrations in one phase.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jced.6c00497
Primary Topic
Ionic liquids properties and applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Systematic Determination of Distribution Constants in Deep Eutectic Solvent–Organic Solvent Biphasic Systems: A Quantitative Database for the Rational Extraction of Bioactive Compounds

Tatiana Bochko, Е.И. Гапанькова, Anna Samuseva
Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data
Ionic liquids properties and applications
article

Systematic Determination of Distribution Constants in Deep Eutectic Solvent–Organic Solvent Biphasic Systems: A Quantitative Database for the Rational Extraction of Bioactive Compounds

Tatiana Bochko, Е.И. Гапанькова, Anna Samuseva
article en

Abstract

Abstract This work determines distribution constants (P) for 19 bioactive compounds (flavonoids, phenolic acids, alkaloids, and glycosides) in biphasic liquid–liquid systems. The systems comprise a deep eutectic solvent (DES) based on choline chloride with urea, malonic acid, or L-lactic acid as one phase, and ethyl acetate or 1-octanol as the organic phase. Measurements were performed at 25.0 ± 0.1 °C and ambient pressure using HPLC-UV analysis. Apparent distribution constants (logP) range from about −3.4 to +2.8, depending on DES composition, organic solvent, and solute hydrogen-bonding functionality. For most solutes, distribution constants are higher in ethyl acetate/DES than in 1-octanol/DES, with differences from less than 1 order of magnitude to over 2 orders of magnitude. Notable exceptions exist; for example, chlorogenic acid partitions less into ethyl acetate for certain DES compositions, and sinapic acid with ChCl–U gives a higher value in octanol. The P values, expressed on a molality basis, provide a quantitative thermodynamic basis for rational design of selective extraction processes, replacing empirical solvent screening with a predictive, data-driven approach. For quinic acid, ursolic acid, rutin, and apigenin, distribution constants could not be determined in some systems owing to low solubility or undetectable concentrations in one phase.

Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data
National Academy of Sciences of Belarus (BY), St Petersburg University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Ionic liquids properties and applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.