Digital-Twin-Driven Inversion of Gap Deformation in a Passenger Aircraft Door–Frame Assembly

Accurate prediction and inversion of time-dependent gap deformation between a passenger aircraft door and its frame remain difficult under slowly varying pressurization because the response is governed by coupled geometry, lock restraint, and nonlinear contact. This study develops a digital-twin-driven inversion framework for door–frame gap deformation. A physics-based parametric twin is established using feature associations and a unified assembly datum, and the outer skin, stiffeners, load-bearing frame, inner panel, locks, and door frame are represented in a nonlinear quasi-static finite-element model. Geometric nonlinearity and a separable door–frame contact are retained so that load-dependent opening, local slip, and constraint effects can be captured. A full-scale test platform with binocular vision provides three-directional relative-displacement measurements. The numerical model is updated through equivalent-stiffness correction, local nodal adjustment, and global scaling, with physical restrictions imposed on the adjustable region and correction amplitudes to avoid unconstrained point-wise fitting; corrected simulation and experimental data are then fused for surrogate training. An improved Gaussian process regression model uses the normalized pressure level, spatial coordinates of the registered key-point pairs, and displacement-direction encoding as inputs and the corresponding fused directional gap displacement as the output; a squared-exponential kernel and input-dependent noise model represent nonlinear response and uncertainty. Under an identical within-profile training–validation partition, the reported GPR implementation yields lower aggregate error than the corresponding RBF-NN and random-forest benchmark runs, with a root-mean-square error of 0.21, a mean relative error of 2.8%, and a coefficient of determination of 0.985. These metrics quantify interpolation within the calibrated slowly varying quasi-static loading domain rather than validated extrapolation to an independent unseen load history. The framework provides a mechanism-consistent route for virtual–physical updating and surrogate-based inversion of aircraft door–frame gap states.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Aerospace
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace13100876
Primary Topic
Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Digital-Twin-Driven Inversion of Gap Deformation in a Passenger Aircraft Door–Frame Assembly

Wei Yin, Zonghua Zhang, Guofeng Zhang, Haitao Xue et al.
Aerospace
Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
article

Digital-Twin-Driven Inversion of Gap Deformation in a Passenger Aircraft Door–Frame Assembly

Wei Yin, Zonghua Zhang, Guofeng Zhang, Haitao Xue, Weiwei He, Zeqing Yang, Hongwei Zhao, Jianqiang Zhou, Ning Hu
article en

Abstract

Accurate prediction and inversion of time-dependent gap deformation between a passenger aircraft door and its frame remain difficult under slowly varying pressurization because the response is governed by coupled geometry, lock restraint, and nonlinear contact. This study develops a digital-twin-driven inversion framework for door–frame gap deformation. A physics-based parametric twin is established using feature associations and a unified assembly datum, and the outer skin, stiffeners, load-bearing frame, inner panel, locks, and door frame are represented in a nonlinear quasi-static finite-element model. Geometric nonlinearity and a separable door–frame contact are retained so that load-dependent opening, local slip, and constraint effects can be captured. A full-scale test platform with binocular vision provides three-directional relative-displacement measurements. The numerical model is updated through equivalent-stiffness correction, local nodal adjustment, and global scaling, with physical restrictions imposed on the adjustable region and correction amplitudes to avoid unconstrained point-wise fitting; corrected simulation and experimental data are then fused for surrogate training. An improved Gaussian process regression model uses the normalized pressure level, spatial coordinates of the registered key-point pairs, and displacement-direction encoding as inputs and the corresponding fused directional gap displacement as the output; a squared-exponential kernel and input-dependent noise model represent nonlinear response and uncertainty. Under an identical within-profile training–validation partition, the reported GPR implementation yields lower aggregate error than the corresponding RBF-NN and random-forest benchmark runs, with a root-mean-square error of 0.21, a mean relative error of 2.8%, and a coefficient of determination of 0.985. These metrics quantify interpolation within the calibrated slowly varying quasi-static loading domain rather than validated extrapolation to an independent unseen load history. The framework provides a mechanism-consistent route for virtual–physical updating and surrogate-based inversion of aircraft door–frame gap states.

AerospaceVol. 13(10)
Xihua University (CN), Hebei University of Technology (CN), Aircraft Strength Research Institute (China) (CN), Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.