Solidarity in writing: reading MLF literature as collective practice

Feminist thought spilling from the French Women’s Movement of the 1970s has had crucial impact on feminist and queer theories today. Still, political texts by Marxist feminists of this moment have routinely been read as testimony of the collective political actions that were lost in the late 1970s when collectivity dissolved into individualism. Contrary to the reception of texts by their poststructuralist peers, the reception of texts by Marxist feminists – not pertaining to the French context alone – gives little attention to how these work in terms of their form and style. Conversely, this essay rereads a key example of one such Marxist feminist text – Anne Tristan’s and Annie de Pisan’s Histoires du M.L.F. (1977) – arguing that it performs the activism and collective work that it relates to and thematises. Furthermore, the essay argues that by creating relation across time, Histoires du M.L.F simultaneously creates a version of feminist solidarity that exceeds the moment of the 1970s and puts under pressure the dominant narrative that collectivity should have been lost to feminist history.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Textual Practice
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/0950236x.2026.2736505
Primary Topic
French Historical and Cultural Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Solidarity in writing: reading MLF literature as collective practice

Amanda Grimsbo Roswall
Textual Practice
French Historical and Cultural Studies
article

Solidarity in writing: reading MLF literature as collective practice

Amanda Grimsbo Roswall
article en

Abstract

Feminist thought spilling from the French Women’s Movement of the 1970s has had crucial impact on feminist and queer theories today. Still, political texts by Marxist feminists of this moment have routinely been read as testimony of the collective political actions that were lost in the late 1970s when collectivity dissolved into individualism. Contrary to the reception of texts by their poststructuralist peers, the reception of texts by Marxist feminists – not pertaining to the French context alone – gives little attention to how these work in terms of their form and style. Conversely, this essay rereads a key example of one such Marxist feminist text – Anne Tristan’s and Annie de Pisan’s Histoires du M.L.F. (1977) – arguing that it performs the activism and collective work that it relates to and thematises. Furthermore, the essay argues that by creating relation across time, Histoires du M.L.F simultaneously creates a version of feminist solidarity that exceeds the moment of the 1970s and puts under pressure the dominant narrative that collectivity should have been lost to feminist history.

Textual Practice
University of Copenhagen (DK)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
French Historical and Cultural Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Solidarity in writing: reading MLF literature as collective practice — Amanda Grimsbo Roswall · Textual Practice (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS