Neighbourhood linguistic accessibility for older people in Singapore: Spatial mismatch and linguistic gentrification

Linguistic accessibility, the availability of services and information in languages familiar to residents, remains largely absent from environmental gerontology and age-friendly city assessment frameworks, despite its growing significance for older adults in multilingual cities undergoing rapid language policy transitions. This study develops a framework of neighbourhood linguistic accessibility for older people and applies it to 10 planning areas with high older-adult concentrations in Singapore. Using 3922 points of interest and 31,275 online reviews collected from Google Maps, it constructs dual supply-side (D1) and demand-side (D2) linguistic diversity indices, refined through sentiment analysis to better reflect the linguistic experiences of everyday service use, and analysed through spatial clustering to identify distributional patterns across the urban environment. The results reveal a systematic spatial mismatch: linguistic diversity hotspots concentrate in the Central Business District, while mature estates where more than 25% of residents are aged 65 and above display no comparable linguistic accessibility. Within Singapore’s planning structure, which designates town centres as mixed-use daily service hubs for older residents, linguistic accessibility varies markedly, with only a minority showing meaningful multilingual diversity. These mismatches suggest two mechanisms of linguistic gentrification: globalisation-driven concentration of multilingual environments, and community-renewal-driven displacement of historically inclusive spaces. Identifying four spatial configurations and four differentiated policy categories, the study challenges the assumption that signage diversity equates to accessibility and calls for embedding language–competence alignment within age-friendly assessment frameworks, offering a transferable approach to achieving linguistic equity in multilingual urban governance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Urban Studies
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980261486152
Primary Topic
Multilingual Education and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Neighbourhood linguistic accessibility for older people in Singapore: Spatial mismatch and linguistic gentrification

Xinyi Wang, Gaoyuan Wang, Zhuoxu Qi
Urban Studies
Multilingual Education and Policy
article

Neighbourhood linguistic accessibility for older people in Singapore: Spatial mismatch and linguistic gentrification

Xinyi Wang, Gaoyuan Wang, Zhuoxu Qi
article en

Abstract

Linguistic accessibility, the availability of services and information in languages familiar to residents, remains largely absent from environmental gerontology and age-friendly city assessment frameworks, despite its growing significance for older adults in multilingual cities undergoing rapid language policy transitions. This study develops a framework of neighbourhood linguistic accessibility for older people and applies it to 10 planning areas with high older-adult concentrations in Singapore. Using 3922 points of interest and 31,275 online reviews collected from Google Maps, it constructs dual supply-side (D1) and demand-side (D2) linguistic diversity indices, refined through sentiment analysis to better reflect the linguistic experiences of everyday service use, and analysed through spatial clustering to identify distributional patterns across the urban environment. The results reveal a systematic spatial mismatch: linguistic diversity hotspots concentrate in the Central Business District, while mature estates where more than 25% of residents are aged 65 and above display no comparable linguistic accessibility. Within Singapore’s planning structure, which designates town centres as mixed-use daily service hubs for older residents, linguistic accessibility varies markedly, with only a minority showing meaningful multilingual diversity. These mismatches suggest two mechanisms of linguistic gentrification: globalisation-driven concentration of multilingual environments, and community-renewal-driven displacement of historically inclusive spaces. Identifying four spatial configurations and four differentiated policy categories, the study challenges the assumption that signage diversity equates to accessibility and calls for embedding language–competence alignment within age-friendly assessment frameworks, offering a transferable approach to achieving linguistic equity in multilingual urban governance.

Urban Studies
National University of Singapore (SG), Hunan University (CN), Southeast University (CN)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Multilingual Education and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.