Arthur H. Cole: Rethinking Entrepreneurship in Society

Abstract This article offers a biographical reappraisal of Arthur H. Cole (1889–1974) as a field creator and architect of business history’s mid-century ambitions. It traces how institutional position and financial security enabled Cole to develop a research program for entrepreneurial history by redefining its evidentiary base, organizing it as a collective and interdisciplinary endeavor, and articulating an analytical framework for it. The article argues that Cole advanced two arguments that continue to provoke the field. First, he promoted the study of entrepreneurship without heroes, resisting great-firm and great-man narratives by treating entrepreneurial change primarily as a knowledge problem. Second, he sought to align levels of analysis, tracing the entrepreneurial function from micro-level decision-making through meso-level interfirm ecologies to macro-level social legitimacy. To communicate this complex agenda, Cole often theorized in metaphors, notably the “entrepreneurial stream,” that helped his ideas travel even when his synthesis proved difficult to canonize.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Business History Review
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007680526102013
Primary Topic
Management and Organizational Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Arthur H. Cole: Rethinking Entrepreneurship in Society

Christina Lubinski
The Business History Review
Management and Organizational Studies
article

Arthur H. Cole: Rethinking Entrepreneurship in Society

Christina Lubinski
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article offers a biographical reappraisal of Arthur H. Cole (1889–1974) as a field creator and architect of business history’s mid-century ambitions. It traces how institutional position and financial security enabled Cole to develop a research program for entrepreneurial history by redefining its evidentiary base, organizing it as a collective and interdisciplinary endeavor, and articulating an analytical framework for it. The article argues that Cole advanced two arguments that continue to provoke the field. First, he promoted the study of entrepreneurship without heroes, resisting great-firm and great-man narratives by treating entrepreneurial change primarily as a knowledge problem. Second, he sought to align levels of analysis, tracing the entrepreneurial function from micro-level decision-making through meso-level interfirm ecologies to macro-level social legitimacy. To communicate this complex agenda, Cole often theorized in metaphors, notably the “entrepreneurial stream,” that helped his ideas travel even when his synthesis proved difficult to canonize.

The Business History Review
Copenhagen Business School (DK)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Management and Organizational Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Arthur H. Cole: Rethinking Entrepreneurship in Society — Christina Lubinski · The Business History Review (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS