Impact of Transport Team Simulations

Introduction: An estimated 250,000 children each year are transported between hospitals, with many of these transports performed by pediatric critical care transport teams (PCCTs). The makeup and education of these teams varies widely, and many are incorporating simulation into their training. The purpose of this study was to examine postsimulation debrief sessions to better understand how programs experience PCCT education using simulation. Methods: Twelve transport centers and a total of 78 transport teams nationwide participated in the multicenter Improving Pediatric Acute Care Through Simulation (ImPACTS) transport simulation study in which simulation was utilized to measure and compare PCCT performance. Each team went through 3 simulated cases followed by debriefing sessions. Qualitative analysis was conducted on 23 debriefing sessions from 6 centers. A thematic analysis approach using both inductive and deductive techniques was used to identify themes representing elements of practices, thoughts, and beliefs to better understand debriefing approaches used by facilitators and the content of debriefings. Results: We identified themes in 4 major categories: (1) debriefing process elements (advocacy inquiry, directive feedback, learner self-assessment, shared mental model, and addressing learning objectives); (2) latent safety threats (personnel or staffing, protocol, workspace or environment); (3) response to simulation; and (4) team dynamics. Debriefing process elements reflected how facilitators conducted debriefings, while the remaining categories reflected the content and insights generated during debriefings. Conclusions: Simulation participants found simulation to be realistic and a helpful tool to identify latent safety threats in their work. Simulation facilitators used consistent strategies to meet learning objectives and support learners in processing their simulation experience. Debriefing also provided insights to system-level vulnerabilities, suggesting a role for simulation not only in education, but also as a quality improvement tool.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Simulation in Healthcare The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/sih.0000000000000973
Primary Topic
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Impact of Transport Team Simulations

Daniel J Scherzer, Ranna A. Rozenfeld, Lauren M. Maloney, Snimarjot Kaur et al.
Simulation in Healthcare The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
article

Impact of Transport Team Simulations

Daniel J Scherzer, Ranna A. Rozenfeld, Lauren M. Maloney, Snimarjot Kaur, Ingrid M. Anderson, Kamal Abulebda, Devin A. McKissic, Robyn Wing, Improving Pediatric Acute Care Through Simulation (ImPACTS), Erin Montgomery, Christopher Kennedy, Rachel Umoren, Jessica J. Wall
article en

Abstract

Introduction: An estimated 250,000 children each year are transported between hospitals, with many of these transports performed by pediatric critical care transport teams (PCCTs). The makeup and education of these teams varies widely, and many are incorporating simulation into their training. The purpose of this study was to examine postsimulation debrief sessions to better understand how programs experience PCCT education using simulation. Methods: Twelve transport centers and a total of 78 transport teams nationwide participated in the multicenter Improving Pediatric Acute Care Through Simulation (ImPACTS) transport simulation study in which simulation was utilized to measure and compare PCCT performance. Each team went through 3 simulated cases followed by debriefing sessions. Qualitative analysis was conducted on 23 debriefing sessions from 6 centers. A thematic analysis approach using both inductive and deductive techniques was used to identify themes representing elements of practices, thoughts, and beliefs to better understand debriefing approaches used by facilitators and the content of debriefings. Results: We identified themes in 4 major categories: (1) debriefing process elements (advocacy inquiry, directive feedback, learner self-assessment, shared mental model, and addressing learning objectives); (2) latent safety threats (personnel or staffing, protocol, workspace or environment); (3) response to simulation; and (4) team dynamics. Debriefing process elements reflected how facilitators conducted debriefings, while the remaining categories reflected the content and insights generated during debriefings. Conclusions: Simulation participants found simulation to be realistic and a helpful tool to identify latent safety threats in their work. Simulation facilitators used consistent strategies to meet learning objectives and support learners in processing their simulation experience. Debriefing also provided insights to system-level vulnerabilities, suggesting a role for simulation not only in education, but also as a quality improvement tool.

Simulation in Healthcare The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.