The shifting landscape of assessment in STEM education in the age of generative AI

Abstract This article focuses on the impact of generative AI (GenAI) on assessment in STEM education. Guided by the assessment triangle as a conceptual framework, we take an ecosystems perspective to review the extant STEM education literature and identify how GenAI affects what is assessed (cognition), how evidence of learning is elicited (observation), and the inferences drawn from that evidence (interpretation). Our review of recent relevant studies identifies three emerging themes that scholars may further explore in this article collection: (1) how AI has become entangled in assessment systems, including its effects on the validity of assessment evidence, the redesign of assessment practices, and institutional policies concerning students’ and instructors’ understandings of acceptable AI use; (2) how AI is being used to analyze assessment evidence and provide feedback; and (3) the need for AI-generated instructional materials to be evaluated and validated for use in learning and assessment. We conclude by broadly discussing potential directions for future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of STEM Education
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-026-00648-5
Primary Topic
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

The shifting landscape of assessment in STEM education in the age of generative AI

Milo Koretsky, Thomas K. F. Chiu, Jonas Hällström, Meixia Ding et al.
International Journal of STEM Education
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
article

The shifting landscape of assessment in STEM education in the age of generative AI

Milo Koretsky, Thomas K. F. Chiu, Jonas Hällström, Meixia Ding, Yeping Li
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article focuses on the impact of generative AI (GenAI) on assessment in STEM education. Guided by the assessment triangle as a conceptual framework, we take an ecosystems perspective to review the extant STEM education literature and identify how GenAI affects what is assessed (cognition), how evidence of learning is elicited (observation), and the inferences drawn from that evidence (interpretation). Our review of recent relevant studies identifies three emerging themes that scholars may further explore in this article collection: (1) how AI has become entangled in assessment systems, including its effects on the validity of assessment evidence, the redesign of assessment practices, and institutional policies concerning students’ and instructors’ understandings of acceptable AI use; (2) how AI is being used to analyze assessment evidence and provide feedback; and (3) the need for AI-generated instructional materials to be evaluated and validated for use in learning and assessment. We conclude by broadly discussing potential directions for future research.

International Journal of STEM EducationVol. 13(1)
Linköping University (SE), Tufts University (US), Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), Temple University (US), Texas A&M University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The shifting landscape of assessment in STEM education in the age of generative AI — Milo Koretsky, Thomas K. F. Chiu, et al. · International Journal of STEM Education (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS