Deep Learning Benchmarks for Multi-Step Photovoltaic Power Forecasting: Comparative Assessment of GRU, LSTM, and BiLSTM Architectures

Accurate photovoltaic (PV) power forecasting is essential for renewable energy integration, dynamic reserve allocation, and generation scheduling. Unpredicted generation ramps induce substantial voltage and frequency deviations on grid-connected distribution networks. This paper provides an objective benchmark among three deep learning architectures: Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), and Bidirectional LSTM (BiLSTM). Telemetry spanning one year from an operational 175 kW plant in Reggane, Algeria, is evaluated across 72 h horizons (H=288 steps at 15 min resolution) using a Direct Multi-Input Multi-Output framework under strict chronological splitting. The models are systematically evaluated across 1848 rolling 72 h forecast windows using a controlled benchmark protocol under daylight-only conditions (GHI>5 W/m2) against a Diurnal Smart Persistence baseline. Accuracy is assessed via daylight capacity-normalized MAE (nMAE), nRMSE, Diebold–Mariano tests (h=72 lags), and ramp metrics across 34,840 events. The results demonstrate that deep architectures significantly outperform persistence (p<0.001). BiLSTM achieves superior overall accuracy (nMAE=2.84%, nRMSE=3.60%, R2=0.985, skill score = 79.37%) and the highest ramp fidelity (F1-Ramp = 0.965, RME=6.97 kW, yielding 54.95% ramp error reduction). Standard LSTM demonstrates competitive performance (nMAE=3.19%, skill score = 77.95%), whereas GRU exhibits higher deviations (nMAE=5.05%, skill score = 66.91%). Measured sub-millisecond latencies (0.07–0.11 ms/sample) confirm that computational overhead is negligible for 15 min dispatch, establishing BiLSTM as optimal for operational dispatch.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energies
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/en19194594
Primary Topic
Solar Radiation and Photovoltaics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Deep Learning Benchmarks for Multi-Step Photovoltaic Power Forecasting: Comparative Assessment of GRU, LSTM, and BiLSTM Architectures

Islam Nacereddine El Ghoul, Antar Beddar, Farid Hadjrioua, Jun Jiat Tiang et al.
Energies
Solar Radiation and Photovoltaics
article

Deep Learning Benchmarks for Multi-Step Photovoltaic Power Forecasting: Comparative Assessment of GRU, LSTM, and BiLSTM Architectures

Islam Nacereddine El Ghoul, Antar Beddar, Farid Hadjrioua, Jun Jiat Tiang, Abdelbasset Azzouz
article en

Abstract

Accurate photovoltaic (PV) power forecasting is essential for renewable energy integration, dynamic reserve allocation, and generation scheduling. Unpredicted generation ramps induce substantial voltage and frequency deviations on grid-connected distribution networks. This paper provides an objective benchmark among three deep learning architectures: Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), and Bidirectional LSTM (BiLSTM). Telemetry spanning one year from an operational 175 kW plant in Reggane, Algeria, is evaluated across 72 h horizons (H=288 steps at 15 min resolution) using a Direct Multi-Input Multi-Output framework under strict chronological splitting. The models are systematically evaluated across 1848 rolling 72 h forecast windows using a controlled benchmark protocol under daylight-only conditions (GHI>5 W/m2) against a Diurnal Smart Persistence baseline. Accuracy is assessed via daylight capacity-normalized MAE (nMAE), nRMSE, Diebold–Mariano tests (h=72 lags), and ramp metrics across 34,840 events. The results demonstrate that deep architectures significantly outperform persistence (p<0.001). BiLSTM achieves superior overall accuracy (nMAE=2.84%, nRMSE=3.60%, R2=0.985, skill score = 79.37%) and the highest ramp fidelity (F1-Ramp = 0.965, RME=6.97 kW, yielding 54.95% ramp error reduction). Standard LSTM demonstrates competitive performance (nMAE=3.19%, skill score = 77.95%), whereas GRU exhibits higher deviations (nMAE=5.05%, skill score = 66.91%). Measured sub-millisecond latencies (0.07–0.11 ms/sample) confirm that computational overhead is negligible for 15 min dispatch, establishing BiLSTM as optimal for operational dispatch.

EnergiesVol. 19(19)
Multimedia University (MY), University of Ghardaia (DZ), CRSTRA (DZ)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Solar Radiation and Photovoltaics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.