Geriatric co-managed prehabilitation before esophagectomy in patients aged ≥ 65 years with esophageal cancer: a prospective feasibility study with matched historical controls

Abstract Purpose Older patients undergoing esophagectomy remain at high risk for perioperative morbidity. This study evaluated the feasibility, safety and adherence of a multimodal prehabilitation program integrated with geriatric co-management in patients aged ≥ 65 years scheduled for transthoracic esophagectomy and explored perioperative outcomes. Methods In this single-center prospective feasibility study, patients aged ≥ 65 years scheduled for transthoracic esophagectomy completed a 4-week home-based program of endurance, respiratory, resistance and balance training combined with comprehensive geriatric assessment and medication optimization. Feasibility outcomes were retention, adherence and data completeness. Perioperative outcomes were compared with a 2:1 matched historical control cohort using cluster-robust linear regression for continuous outcomes and Firth penalized logistic regression for binary outcomes. Results Twenty-six patients were enrolled; 22 completed the intervention and were matched to 42 control records. At the first check-in 61.5% reported complete and 84.6% complete or mostly complete adherence; documentation was missing for 69.2% at the second. Despite matching, controls had more favorable performance status ( p = 0.023) and comorbidity burden ( p = 0.014). Postoperative complications, anastomotic leakage, hospital mortality and length of stay did not differ significantly. Intensive care unit (ICU) readmission was lower after prehabilitation (4.5% vs. 26.2%; odds ratio 0.19, 95% confidence interval 0.02–0.90; p = 0.035), but not after adjustment for surgical approach (adjusted odds ratio 0.30; p = 0.172). Conclusion Multimodal prehabilitation with geriatric co-management was feasible and safe in this population. Overall postoperative morbidity was unchanged. The lower ICU readmission rate did not withstand adjustment and is hypothesis-generating requiring an adequately powered randomized trial. Future programs need more robust adherence monitoring. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05167682, registered 9 December 2021, retrospectively registered.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Langenbeck s Archives of Surgery
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-026-04285-y
Primary Topic
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Geriatric co-managed prehabilitation before esophagectomy in patients aged ≥ 65 years with esophageal cancer: a prospective feasibility study with matched historical controls

Emily Haak, Christiane J. Bruns, Hans Schlößer, Linus Alexander Völker et al.
Langenbeck s Archives of Surgery
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
article

Geriatric co-managed prehabilitation before esophagectomy in patients aged ≥ 65 years with esophageal cancer: a prospective feasibility study with matched historical controls

Emily Haak, Christiane J. Bruns, Hans Schlößer, Linus Alexander Völker, Paul Thomas Brinkkoetter, Wolfgang Schroeder, Pauline Schumacher
article en

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Older patients undergoing esophagectomy remain at high risk for perioperative morbidity. This study evaluated the feasibility, safety and adherence of a multimodal prehabilitation program integrated with geriatric co-management in patients aged ≥ 65 years scheduled for transthoracic esophagectomy and explored perioperative outcomes. Methods In this single-center prospective feasibility study, patients aged ≥ 65 years scheduled for transthoracic esophagectomy completed a 4-week home-based program of endurance, respiratory, resistance and balance training combined with comprehensive geriatric assessment and medication optimization. Feasibility outcomes were retention, adherence and data completeness. Perioperative outcomes were compared with a 2:1 matched historical control cohort using cluster-robust linear regression for continuous outcomes and Firth penalized logistic regression for binary outcomes. Results Twenty-six patients were enrolled; 22 completed the intervention and were matched to 42 control records. At the first check-in 61.5% reported complete and 84.6% complete or mostly complete adherence; documentation was missing for 69.2% at the second. Despite matching, controls had more favorable performance status ( p = 0.023) and comorbidity burden ( p = 0.014). Postoperative complications, anastomotic leakage, hospital mortality and length of stay did not differ significantly. Intensive care unit (ICU) readmission was lower after prehabilitation (4.5% vs. 26.2%; odds ratio 0.19, 95% confidence interval 0.02–0.90; p = 0.035), but not after adjustment for surgical approach (adjusted odds ratio 0.30; p = 0.172). Conclusion Multimodal prehabilitation with geriatric co-management was feasible and safe in this population. Overall postoperative morbidity was unchanged. The lower ICU readmission rate did not withstand adjustment and is hypothesis-generating requiring an adequately powered randomized trial. Future programs need more robust adherence monitoring. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05167682, registered 9 December 2021, retrospectively registered.

Langenbeck s Archives of Surgery
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.