Developing a Framework to Evaluate the Social Value Impact of Residential Property Development Projects in Kuwait

Residential development in Kuwait is shaped by a state-led housing system, rapid urban expansion, extreme climatic conditions, and socio-cultural practices that influence how residents experience housing and neighborhoods. Existing social value and sustainability frameworks provide useful principles for evaluating development outcomes; however, they may require contextual adaptation to address issues that are particularly relevant to Kuwait, including housing allocation, intergenerational living, privacy, maintenance, access to essential facilities, and culturally appropriate communal space. This study develops a stakeholder-informed framework for evaluating the social value of residential property development in Kuwait. A sequential mixed-methods design was adopted. First, a literature review identified five preliminary domains: Political, Social, Economic, Environmental, and Urban and 25 initial indicators. Second, 28 semi-structured interviews were conducted with eight supply-side stakeholders and 20 demand-side stakeholders. Thematic analysis was used to refine the indicator set, resulting in six additional context-specific indicators and a 31-indicator framework. Third, the same participants completed a structured questionnaire using a six-category scale from 0 to 5 to provide exploratory priority ratings. The Urban domain received the highest exploratory weight (24.33%), followed by Social (22.60%), Environmental (20.85%), Economic (18.06%), and Political (14.16%). The highest-ranked indicators were schools, clinics, mosques, and playgrounds (4.34%); accessibility for people with disabilities (4.21%); and resident satisfaction with safety and identity (3.83%). The findings indicate differences between supply-side emphasis on infrastructure delivery, maintenance, and governance and demand-side emphasis on affordability, housing access, environmental conditions, and lived residential experience. The framework is intended as a context-sensitive, exploratory decision-support instrument that can complement established social value approaches in Kuwaiti residential development. Its practical performance and external validity require testing through independent application to completed or live residential projects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18199924
Primary Topic
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Developing a Framework to Evaluate the Social Value Impact of Residential Property Development Projects in Kuwait

Omar Amoudi, Renad Faisal AlMutairi
Sustainability
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
article

Developing a Framework to Evaluate the Social Value Impact of Residential Property Development Projects in Kuwait

Omar Amoudi, Renad Faisal AlMutairi
article en

Abstract

Residential development in Kuwait is shaped by a state-led housing system, rapid urban expansion, extreme climatic conditions, and socio-cultural practices that influence how residents experience housing and neighborhoods. Existing social value and sustainability frameworks provide useful principles for evaluating development outcomes; however, they may require contextual adaptation to address issues that are particularly relevant to Kuwait, including housing allocation, intergenerational living, privacy, maintenance, access to essential facilities, and culturally appropriate communal space. This study develops a stakeholder-informed framework for evaluating the social value of residential property development in Kuwait. A sequential mixed-methods design was adopted. First, a literature review identified five preliminary domains: Political, Social, Economic, Environmental, and Urban and 25 initial indicators. Second, 28 semi-structured interviews were conducted with eight supply-side stakeholders and 20 demand-side stakeholders. Thematic analysis was used to refine the indicator set, resulting in six additional context-specific indicators and a 31-indicator framework. Third, the same participants completed a structured questionnaire using a six-category scale from 0 to 5 to provide exploratory priority ratings. The Urban domain received the highest exploratory weight (24.33%), followed by Social (22.60%), Environmental (20.85%), Economic (18.06%), and Political (14.16%). The highest-ranked indicators were schools, clinics, mosques, and playgrounds (4.34%); accessibility for people with disabilities (4.21%); and resident satisfaction with safety and identity (3.83%). The findings indicate differences between supply-side emphasis on infrastructure delivery, maintenance, and governance and demand-side emphasis on affordability, housing access, environmental conditions, and lived residential experience. The framework is intended as a context-sensitive, exploratory decision-support instrument that can complement established social value approaches in Kuwaiti residential development. Its practical performance and external validity require testing through independent application to completed or live residential projects.

SustainabilityVol. 18(19)
Oxford Brookes University (GB)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.