Modern uniform, feudal culture: the Thai military’s business interests

Abstract This paper argues that the pervasive political and economic power of the Thai military is fundamentally rooted in a neo-feudal logic, echoing the Thai sakdina culture. While modern in appearance, the armed forces operate a patrimonial system where high-ranking officers behave like feudal lords, managing fragmented and autonomous fiefdoms of wealth across decentralized branches. This research identifies two structural pillars of the system: the autonomous fiefdoms and the near-total absence of external oversight. These two pillars facilitate systematic extraction and distribution of commercial revenues hidden from the public gaze. The military’s dominant political position allows it to reclassify private interests as matters of national security, effectively bypassing the rule of law and shielding its economic fiefdoms from civilian scrutiny. Ultimately, this paper underscores that the military’s business operations represent an institutionalized neo-feudal construct, a primary obstacle to professional military reform.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Asian Studies
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1479591426100977
Primary Topic
Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Modern uniform, feudal culture: the Thai military’s business interests

Puangthong Pawakapan
International Journal of Asian Studies
Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies
article

Modern uniform, feudal culture: the Thai military’s business interests

Puangthong Pawakapan
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper argues that the pervasive political and economic power of the Thai military is fundamentally rooted in a neo-feudal logic, echoing the Thai sakdina culture. While modern in appearance, the armed forces operate a patrimonial system where high-ranking officers behave like feudal lords, managing fragmented and autonomous fiefdoms of wealth across decentralized branches. This research identifies two structural pillars of the system: the autonomous fiefdoms and the near-total absence of external oversight. These two pillars facilitate systematic extraction and distribution of commercial revenues hidden from the public gaze. The military’s dominant political position allows it to reclassify private interests as matters of national security, effectively bypassing the rule of law and shielding its economic fiefdoms from civilian scrutiny. Ultimately, this paper underscores that the military’s business operations represent an institutionalized neo-feudal construct, a primary obstacle to professional military reform.

International Journal of Asian Studies
Chulalongkorn University (TH)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.