Microbial Surveillance of Commonly Encountered Clinical Surfaces Within a Veterinary Ophthalmology Service

ABSTRACT Objective To establish surveillance of organisms found on high‐touch clinical surfaces within a veterinary teaching hospital ophthalmology service and record trends that may foster additional studies investigating links between environmental microbiota and pathogenic bacteria affecting the ocular surface. Procedures Samples from 17 high touch surfaces in the ophthalmology department of a veterinary teaching hospital were collected over four consecutive Monday mornings, with additional samples taken 9 months later on a Monday morning and Thursday afternoon of the same week. Samples were processed using standard culture methods, with additional specific testing for Salmonella species, carbapenemase‐producing Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), and methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus (MRSsp). Results Out of 102 samples collected for aerobic bacterial culture, 11 (11%) showed no growth and 91 (89%) yielded positive results. Of the 211 total isolates found, all exhibited a low colony count. Of the isolates identified, 66/211 (31%) were Staphylococcus spp., followed by 45/211 (21%) Bacillus spp. Exam tables (25/211, 11.8%) and countertops (24/211, 11.4%) had the highest number of isolates. There was no clinically significant difference in the number of isolates found between Monday morning and Thursday afternoon of the same week. Conclusions All isolates were considered incidental environmental findings and cultured in low numbers. When routine cleaning and disinfection procedures are maintained, common surfaces and equipment of ophthalmology departments are unlikely to be pathogenic reservoirs, posing minimal risk to patients. Further studies are recommended to explore correlations between environmental microbiota and pathogenic bacteria affecting the ocular surface in patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Veterinary Ophthalmology
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/vop.70272
Primary Topic
Infection Control in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Microbial Surveillance of Commonly Encountered Clinical Surfaces Within a Veterinary Ophthalmology Service

Georgina M. Newbold, Dixie F. Mollenkopf, Anne J. Gemensky‐Metzler, Joany Van Balen Rubio et al.
Veterinary Ophthalmology
Infection Control in Healthcare
article

Microbial Surveillance of Commonly Encountered Clinical Surfaces Within a Veterinary Ophthalmology Service

Georgina M. Newbold, Dixie F. Mollenkopf, Anne J. Gemensky‐Metzler, Joany Van Balen Rubio, Thomas E. Wittum, Bailey George, Dubraska Diaz‐Campos, Sarah Hoke, Christine Boles
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective To establish surveillance of organisms found on high‐touch clinical surfaces within a veterinary teaching hospital ophthalmology service and record trends that may foster additional studies investigating links between environmental microbiota and pathogenic bacteria affecting the ocular surface. Procedures Samples from 17 high touch surfaces in the ophthalmology department of a veterinary teaching hospital were collected over four consecutive Monday mornings, with additional samples taken 9 months later on a Monday morning and Thursday afternoon of the same week. Samples were processed using standard culture methods, with additional specific testing for Salmonella species, carbapenemase‐producing Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), and methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus (MRSsp). Results Out of 102 samples collected for aerobic bacterial culture, 11 (11%) showed no growth and 91 (89%) yielded positive results. Of the 211 total isolates found, all exhibited a low colony count. Of the isolates identified, 66/211 (31%) were Staphylococcus spp., followed by 45/211 (21%) Bacillus spp. Exam tables (25/211, 11.8%) and countertops (24/211, 11.4%) had the highest number of isolates. There was no clinically significant difference in the number of isolates found between Monday morning and Thursday afternoon of the same week. Conclusions All isolates were considered incidental environmental findings and cultured in low numbers. When routine cleaning and disinfection procedures are maintained, common surfaces and equipment of ophthalmology departments are unlikely to be pathogenic reservoirs, posing minimal risk to patients. Further studies are recommended to explore correlations between environmental microbiota and pathogenic bacteria affecting the ocular surface in patients.

Veterinary OphthalmologyVol. 29(6)
The Ohio State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Infection Control in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.