Good Intentions, Bad Outcomes: Manager-Facilitated Moral Repair and Unethical Pro-Supervisor Behavior

Abstract Managers’ efforts to repair workplace harm are known to benefit both offenders and organizations, yet related research suggests these restorative actions could also lead to unintended negative consequences. Drawing on a framework of restorative justice and unethical prosocial behavior, we examine whether managerial attempts at moral repair can inadvertently prompt employees to engage in unethical pro-supervisor behavior (UPSB). In a multi-wave survey of 244 full-time employees who recalled an incident in which they caused workplace harm, we find that managers’ restorative justice behaviors are positively associated with employees’ subsequent UPSB. This effect is mediated by employees’ gratitude, desire to reciprocate, and identification with their manager. Further, employees with a strong moral identity show weaker links between gratitude, desire to reciprocate, and UPSB. We discuss implications for restorative justice theory and managerial practice.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-026-09609-0
Primary Topic
Ethics in Business and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Good Intentions, Bad Outcomes: Manager-Facilitated Moral Repair and Unethical Pro-Supervisor Behavior

Kenneth D. Butterfield, Kristine M. Kuhn, Thomas M. Tripp, Mengjiao Rebecca He
Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal
Ethics in Business and Education
article

Good Intentions, Bad Outcomes: Manager-Facilitated Moral Repair and Unethical Pro-Supervisor Behavior

Kenneth D. Butterfield, Kristine M. Kuhn, Thomas M. Tripp, Mengjiao Rebecca He
article en

Abstract

Abstract Managers’ efforts to repair workplace harm are known to benefit both offenders and organizations, yet related research suggests these restorative actions could also lead to unintended negative consequences. Drawing on a framework of restorative justice and unethical prosocial behavior, we examine whether managerial attempts at moral repair can inadvertently prompt employees to engage in unethical pro-supervisor behavior (UPSB). In a multi-wave survey of 244 full-time employees who recalled an incident in which they caused workplace harm, we find that managers’ restorative justice behaviors are positively associated with employees’ subsequent UPSB. This effect is mediated by employees’ gratitude, desire to reciprocate, and identification with their manager. Further, employees with a strong moral identity show weaker links between gratitude, desire to reciprocate, and UPSB. We discuss implications for restorative justice theory and managerial practice.

Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Ethics in Business and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Good Intentions, Bad Outcomes: Manager-Facilitated Moral Repair and Unethical Pro-Supervisor Behavior — Kenneth D. Butterfield, Kristine M. Kuhn, et al. · Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS