Comparison of vascular access outcomes in octogenarian patients undergoing hemodialysis

Background: The number of patients aged ⩾80 years with end-stage kidney disease is increasing, making vascular access selection increasingly challenging. Although arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is generally preferred, its advantages over arteriovenous graft (AVG) in very elderly patients remain uncertain. This study compared AVF and AVG outcomes in octogenarian patients undergoing hemodialysis access creation. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 266 patients ⩾80 years who underwent arteriovenous access creation (AVF, n = 163 and AVG, n = 103). The AVF group was further divided into brachiocephalic fistula (BCF, n = 119) and radiocephalic fistula (RCF, n = 44), while the AVG group included lower-arm grafts ( n = 75) and upper-arm grafts ( n = 28). Maturation and patency outcomes were compared, and Cox regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of primary patency. Results: AVF showed significantly higher 1-year primary patency than AVG (63.6% vs 43.5%, p = 0.012), whereas secondary patency was similar between the two groups (86.6% vs 86.8%, p = 0.99). AVF required a longer time to use than AVG (median 51 vs 41 days, p < 0.001), whereas AVG more frequently required repeated percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) after access creation. Within the AVF group, BCF showed higher primary patency compared with RCF (69.4% vs 48.8%, p = 0.036), while non-use rates and secondary patency were similar. In multivariable analysis, minimum vein diameter was the only independent predictor of primary patency (HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.15–0.92; p = 0.033), with an estimated cutoff value of 3.03 mm. Conclusion: In patients aged ⩾80 years, AVF provides superior primary patency despite longer maturation, whereas repeated interventions enabled AVG to achieve comparable secondary patency. These findings support individualized vascular access selection according to expected maturation and clinical circumstances, with preoperative vein diameter serving as an important factor when considering AVF creation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Vascular Access
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298261486404
Primary Topic
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Comparison of vascular access outcomes in octogenarian patients undergoing hemodialysis

Seon-Hee Heo, Soo Jin Kim, Hwa-Hee Koh, Minyu Kang
The Journal of Vascular Access
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
article

Comparison of vascular access outcomes in octogenarian patients undergoing hemodialysis

Seon-Hee Heo, Soo Jin Kim, Hwa-Hee Koh, Minyu Kang
article en

Abstract

Background: The number of patients aged ⩾80 years with end-stage kidney disease is increasing, making vascular access selection increasingly challenging. Although arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is generally preferred, its advantages over arteriovenous graft (AVG) in very elderly patients remain uncertain. This study compared AVF and AVG outcomes in octogenarian patients undergoing hemodialysis access creation. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 266 patients ⩾80 years who underwent arteriovenous access creation (AVF, n = 163 and AVG, n = 103). The AVF group was further divided into brachiocephalic fistula (BCF, n = 119) and radiocephalic fistula (RCF, n = 44), while the AVG group included lower-arm grafts ( n = 75) and upper-arm grafts ( n = 28). Maturation and patency outcomes were compared, and Cox regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of primary patency. Results: AVF showed significantly higher 1-year primary patency than AVG (63.6% vs 43.5%, p = 0.012), whereas secondary patency was similar between the two groups (86.6% vs 86.8%, p = 0.99). AVF required a longer time to use than AVG (median 51 vs 41 days, p < 0.001), whereas AVG more frequently required repeated percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) after access creation. Within the AVF group, BCF showed higher primary patency compared with RCF (69.4% vs 48.8%, p = 0.036), while non-use rates and secondary patency were similar. In multivariable analysis, minimum vein diameter was the only independent predictor of primary patency (HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.15–0.92; p = 0.033), with an estimated cutoff value of 3.03 mm. Conclusion: In patients aged ⩾80 years, AVF provides superior primary patency despite longer maturation, whereas repeated interventions enabled AVG to achieve comparable secondary patency. These findings support individualized vascular access selection according to expected maturation and clinical circumstances, with preoperative vein diameter serving as an important factor when considering AVF creation.

The Journal of Vascular Access
Yonsei University (KR), Ajou University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.