Association of radiation caries burden with time elapsed since completion of radiotherapy in patients with head and neck cancer: A cross-sectional pilot study

Objectives: To assess the burden of dental caries using the Decayed (D) component of the DMFT index and to evaluate its association with time elapsed since completion of radiotherapy. Material and Methods: A cross-sectional pilot study involving 37 head and neck cancer patients who had completed radiotherapy was conducted. Data regarding demographics, tobacco use, awareness of radiation-induced caries, xerostomia severity, and time since radiotherapy. Dental caries burden was measured using the (D) component of the Decayed, Missing, Filled Teeth (DMFT) index. Results: The mean age of participants was 49.46 years, and the mean D score was 4.54 ± 2.83. Patients evaluated 6 months after radiotherapy had a significantly higher caries burden than those evaluated within 3 months (6.92 ± 3.40 vs 3.25 ± 1.26; Mann–Whitney U = 34, p < 0.001). A significant positive correlation was observed between the time elapsed since radiotherapy and the decayed teeth score (r = 0.627, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.381–0.791; p < 0.001). After adjustment, the burden of untreated caries was markedly higher among patients assessed at 6 months than at 3 months after radiotherapy. The median decayed-tooth count was 3 (interquartile range [IQR] 3–4) at 3 months versus 6 (IQR 5–8) at 6 months, a difference that was highly significant (Mann–Whitney U = 34.0, p < 0.001. In an unadjusted Poisson model, patients at 6 months had more than twice the decayed-tooth count of those at 3 months (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 2.13, 95% CI 1.57–2.88, p < 0.001). No significant difference in caries burden was observed across xerostomia grades (Kruskal–Wallis H = 0.943, p = 0.624). Multivariable Poisson regression demonstrated that the time since radiotherapy remained the only independent predictor: patients at 6 months had approximately twice the decayed-tooth count of those at 3 months (adjusted IRR = 2.04, 95% CI 1.43–2.89, p < 0.001). The previously observed association with tobacco use was attenuated and no longer significant (adjusted IRR = 1.02 per year, 95% CI 1.00–1.05, p = 0.112), and neither xerostomia grade nor age was independently associated with the outcome. Only 18.9% of participants were aware of radiation-induced dental caries prior to radiotherapy. Conclusion: A longer interval following completion of radiotherapy was associated with a greater burden of untreated dental care. These findings support early preventive dental interventions, patient education, and structured post-radiotherapy follow-up.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Healthcare Research and Education
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25259/jhre_16_2026
Primary Topic
Oral health in cancer treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Association of radiation caries burden with time elapsed since completion of radiotherapy in patients with head and neck cancer: A cross-sectional pilot study

Rhythm Bains, Kirti Srivastava, Vaibhav Amit, Promila Verma
Journal of Healthcare Research and Education
Oral health in cancer treatment
article

Association of radiation caries burden with time elapsed since completion of radiotherapy in patients with head and neck cancer: A cross-sectional pilot study

Rhythm Bains, Kirti Srivastava, Vaibhav Amit, Promila Verma
article en

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the burden of dental caries using the Decayed (D) component of the DMFT index and to evaluate its association with time elapsed since completion of radiotherapy. Material and Methods: A cross-sectional pilot study involving 37 head and neck cancer patients who had completed radiotherapy was conducted. Data regarding demographics, tobacco use, awareness of radiation-induced caries, xerostomia severity, and time since radiotherapy. Dental caries burden was measured using the (D) component of the Decayed, Missing, Filled Teeth (DMFT) index. Results: The mean age of participants was 49.46 years, and the mean D score was 4.54 ± 2.83. Patients evaluated 6 months after radiotherapy had a significantly higher caries burden than those evaluated within 3 months (6.92 ± 3.40 vs 3.25 ± 1.26; Mann–Whitney U = 34, p < 0.001). A significant positive correlation was observed between the time elapsed since radiotherapy and the decayed teeth score (r = 0.627, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.381–0.791; p < 0.001). After adjustment, the burden of untreated caries was markedly higher among patients assessed at 6 months than at 3 months after radiotherapy. The median decayed-tooth count was 3 (interquartile range [IQR] 3–4) at 3 months versus 6 (IQR 5–8) at 6 months, a difference that was highly significant (Mann–Whitney U = 34.0, p < 0.001. In an unadjusted Poisson model, patients at 6 months had more than twice the decayed-tooth count of those at 3 months (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 2.13, 95% CI 1.57–2.88, p < 0.001). No significant difference in caries burden was observed across xerostomia grades (Kruskal–Wallis H = 0.943, p = 0.624). Multivariable Poisson regression demonstrated that the time since radiotherapy remained the only independent predictor: patients at 6 months had approximately twice the decayed-tooth count of those at 3 months (adjusted IRR = 2.04, 95% CI 1.43–2.89, p < 0.001). The previously observed association with tobacco use was attenuated and no longer significant (adjusted IRR = 1.02 per year, 95% CI 1.00–1.05, p = 0.112), and neither xerostomia grade nor age was independently associated with the outcome. Only 18.9% of participants were aware of radiation-induced dental caries prior to radiotherapy. Conclusion: A longer interval following completion of radiotherapy was associated with a greater burden of untreated dental care. These findings support early preventive dental interventions, patient education, and structured post-radiotherapy follow-up.

Journal of Healthcare Research and EducationVol. 2
King George's Medical University (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Oral health in cancer treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.