Dose-conditioned machine-learning prediction of a composite target sedation state in patients undergoing propofol-sedated gastrointestinal endoscopy

BACKGROUND: During propofol-sedated gastrointestinal endoscopy, adequate sedation must be achieved without compromising hemodynamic stability or oxygenation. We developed and temporally validated dose-conditioned machine-learning models to predict a composite target sedation state. METHODS: This single-center prospective observational study included 1,248 adults. The first 1,000 patients formed the development cohort and the subsequent 248 patients the temporal validation cohort. The composite outcome was assessed after MOAA/S-defined loss of consciousness and before endoscope insertion and required a bispectral index of 40-60, systolic blood pressure ≥80% of baseline, and peripheral oxygen saturation ≥90%. Five models were evaluated using routinely available variables collected before or during initial propofol administration, including the initial propofol dose. RESULTS: The composite target was achieved in 153 patients (15.3%) in the development cohort and 33 (13.3%) in the validation cohort. Validation AUCs ranged from 0.780 to 0.821. Random Forest had the numerically highest AUC (0.821; 95% CI, 0.748-0.889), whereas ExtraTrees had the highest average precision (0.570; 95% CI, 0.388-0.724). Calibration was suboptimal across models. With only 33 validation events, confidence intervals were wide and comparisons among models remain uncertain. CONCLUSIONS: Dose-conditioned machine-learning models showed moderate-to-good discrimination, but calibration remained suboptimal. No single model was uniformly superior. Further recalibration and independent multicenter validation are needed before clinical use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Medicine
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2026.2737005
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Dose-conditioned machine-learning prediction of a composite target sedation state in patients undergoing propofol-sedated gastrointestinal endoscopy

马汉祥, 婉 林, Shangqi Dai, Bo Li et al.
Annals of Medicine
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
article

Dose-conditioned machine-learning prediction of a composite target sedation state in patients undergoing propofol-sedated gastrointestinal endoscopy

马汉祥, 婉 林, Shangqi Dai, Bo Li, Li Mo, Wanji Yang, Yang Fan, Xiaoya Chen, Li Zhao, Huiwen Zhang, Wu Chen
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: During propofol-sedated gastrointestinal endoscopy, adequate sedation must be achieved without compromising hemodynamic stability or oxygenation. We developed and temporally validated dose-conditioned machine-learning models to predict a composite target sedation state. METHODS: This single-center prospective observational study included 1,248 adults. The first 1,000 patients formed the development cohort and the subsequent 248 patients the temporal validation cohort. The composite outcome was assessed after MOAA/S-defined loss of consciousness and before endoscope insertion and required a bispectral index of 40-60, systolic blood pressure ≥80% of baseline, and peripheral oxygen saturation ≥90%. Five models were evaluated using routinely available variables collected before or during initial propofol administration, including the initial propofol dose. RESULTS: The composite target was achieved in 153 patients (15.3%) in the development cohort and 33 (13.3%) in the validation cohort. Validation AUCs ranged from 0.780 to 0.821. Random Forest had the numerically highest AUC (0.821; 95% CI, 0.748-0.889), whereas ExtraTrees had the highest average precision (0.570; 95% CI, 0.388-0.724). Calibration was suboptimal across models. With only 33 validation events, confidence intervals were wide and comparisons among models remain uncertain. CONCLUSIONS: Dose-conditioned machine-learning models showed moderate-to-good discrimination, but calibration remained suboptimal. No single model was uniformly superior. Further recalibration and independent multicenter validation are needed before clinical use.

Annals of MedicineVol. 58(1)
Ningxia Medical University (CN), Ningxia Medical University General Hospital (CN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.