Comparative Design and Cost Assessment of Pad Foundations under Varying Soil Bearing Capacities

Foundation performance and construction economy are strongly influenced by the engineering properties of the supporting ground, particularly allowable bearing capacity. This study comparatively evaluates the structural design and estimated cost of isolated reinforced-concrete pad foundations supporting a one-storey residential building under six allowable bearing-capacity conditions: 50, 100, 150, 200, 250 and 300 kN/m². The original design model was analysed using ProtaStructure and developed using Eurocode-based principles. Foundation dimensions, depths, reinforcement-related design actions, bending moments and shear responses were compared, after which the resulting quantities were assessed using a bill-of-quantities approach with constant study rates. The estimated foundation cost decreased substantially from ₦7,282,222 at 50 kN/m² to ₦3,014,905 at 250 kN/m². A further increase to 300 kN/m² produced a marginal increase to ₦3,015,128. This indicates that once practical minimum footing dimensions and structural detailing requirements become controlling, additional bearing capacity may provide little or no further economic benefit. Within the scenarios investigated, 250 kN/m² produced the lowest estimated cost. The findings demonstrate that foundation optimisation requires integration of geotechnical investigation, structural design and quantity surveying rather than consideration of bearing pressure alone.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Iconic Research and Engineering Journals
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64388/irev10i3-1722762
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Comparative Design and Cost Assessment of Pad Foundations under Varying Soil Bearing Capacities

Auwalu Sani Shehu, Okoli Collins Chukwuebuka, Okonkwo John Chukwuma
Iconic Research and Engineering Journals
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
article

Comparative Design and Cost Assessment of Pad Foundations under Varying Soil Bearing Capacities

Auwalu Sani Shehu, Okoli Collins Chukwuebuka, Okonkwo John Chukwuma
article en

Abstract

Foundation performance and construction economy are strongly influenced by the engineering properties of the supporting ground, particularly allowable bearing capacity. This study comparatively evaluates the structural design and estimated cost of isolated reinforced-concrete pad foundations supporting a one-storey residential building under six allowable bearing-capacity conditions: 50, 100, 150, 200, 250 and 300 kN/m². The original design model was analysed using ProtaStructure and developed using Eurocode-based principles. Foundation dimensions, depths, reinforcement-related design actions, bending moments and shear responses were compared, after which the resulting quantities were assessed using a bill-of-quantities approach with constant study rates. The estimated foundation cost decreased substantially from ₦7,282,222 at 50 kN/m² to ₦3,014,905 at 250 kN/m². A further increase to 300 kN/m² produced a marginal increase to ₦3,015,128. This indicates that once practical minimum footing dimensions and structural detailing requirements become controlling, additional bearing capacity may provide little or no further economic benefit. Within the scenarios investigated, 250 kN/m² produced the lowest estimated cost. The findings demonstrate that foundation optimisation requires integration of geotechnical investigation, structural design and quantity surveying rather than consideration of bearing pressure alone.

Iconic Research and Engineering JournalsVol. 10(3)
Nnamdi Azikiwe University (NG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.