Musical Instrument Practice as Sensorimotor and Motor–Cognitive Skill Training in Healthy Aging

Background/Objectives: Playing a musical instrument requires precisely timed movements, bimanual or interlimb coordination, visuomotor mapping, auditory and somatosensory feedback, sequence learning, prediction, and executive regulation. This narrative review synthesizes motor, cognitive, and neuroplastic adaptations associated with active instrumental practice in predominantly healthy adults aged 60 years or older, interpreting practice as a complex sensorimotor and motor–cognitive skill activity. Methods: English-language literature from January 2016 through August 2026 was searched in PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection, supplemented by Google Scholar and citation chasing. Randomized and controlled interventions were prioritized, with longitudinal and observational evidence used contextually; earlier studies were included selectively for seminal or mechanistic context. Results: Direct motor evidence was less abundant than cognitive evidence. Both piano and mallet-percussion programs improved task-proximal bimanual synchronization, and one large active-control trial found greater improvement in untrained unimanual fine-motor control after one year of piano practice. Selective near transfer to continuation timing was also reported, whereas evidence for generalized dexterity, gait, balance, lower-limb coordination, and everyday motor function remained limited or mixed. Cognitive effects were selective, particularly for processing speed, verbal fluency or switching, and some working-memory measures. Neuroplastic findings included cortical-thickness increase, relative structural preservation, altered auditory–motor connectivity, reduced task activation, and oscillatory modulation. Conclusions: Instrumental practice may provide an engaging and adaptable form of sensorimotor and motor–cognitive skill practice in healthy aging, but broad transfer and neuroprotection are not established. Future trials should quantify skill acquisition, dose, retention, and transfer and compare instrument-specific demands.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Brain Sciences
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci16101038
Primary Topic
Musicians’ Health and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Musical Instrument Practice as Sensorimotor and Motor–Cognitive Skill Training in Healthy Aging

Gianpiero Greco, Francesco Fischetti, Stefania Cataldi, Domenico Desantis
Brain Sciences
Musicians’ Health and Performance
article

Musical Instrument Practice as Sensorimotor and Motor–Cognitive Skill Training in Healthy Aging

Gianpiero Greco, Francesco Fischetti, Stefania Cataldi, Domenico Desantis
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Playing a musical instrument requires precisely timed movements, bimanual or interlimb coordination, visuomotor mapping, auditory and somatosensory feedback, sequence learning, prediction, and executive regulation. This narrative review synthesizes motor, cognitive, and neuroplastic adaptations associated with active instrumental practice in predominantly healthy adults aged 60 years or older, interpreting practice as a complex sensorimotor and motor–cognitive skill activity. Methods: English-language literature from January 2016 through August 2026 was searched in PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection, supplemented by Google Scholar and citation chasing. Randomized and controlled interventions were prioritized, with longitudinal and observational evidence used contextually; earlier studies were included selectively for seminal or mechanistic context. Results: Direct motor evidence was less abundant than cognitive evidence. Both piano and mallet-percussion programs improved task-proximal bimanual synchronization, and one large active-control trial found greater improvement in untrained unimanual fine-motor control after one year of piano practice. Selective near transfer to continuation timing was also reported, whereas evidence for generalized dexterity, gait, balance, lower-limb coordination, and everyday motor function remained limited or mixed. Cognitive effects were selective, particularly for processing speed, verbal fluency or switching, and some working-memory measures. Neuroplastic findings included cortical-thickness increase, relative structural preservation, altered auditory–motor connectivity, reduced task activation, and oscillatory modulation. Conclusions: Instrumental practice may provide an engaging and adaptable form of sensorimotor and motor–cognitive skill practice in healthy aging, but broad transfer and neuroprotection are not established. Future trials should quantify skill acquisition, dose, retention, and transfer and compare instrument-specific demands.

Brain SciencesVol. 16(10)
Pegaso University (IT), University of Bari Aldo Moro (IT)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Musicians’ Health and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.