National Bias and Home Advantage in International Dancesport Judging

Subjective sports judging is vulnerable to bias, with national bias being the most widespread and well-studied form; however, dancesport has not been empirically studied for this despite the phenomenon being well documented in related sports. This paper investigates national bias among international dancesport adjudicators during the 2024–2026 period, using a novel dataset of 992 judge-level observations from eight international tournaments and a panel OLS model with tournament fixed effects and clustered standard errors. The main findings reveal evidence of in-group favoritism (β = −0.407, p < 0.001) and an unexpected negative home- advantage effect (β = +0.183, p < 0.01). Both findings were directionally robust across three robustness checks. This study is, to my knowledge, the first documented evidence of national bias in dancesport, and its findings are relevant for judging-panel design and transparency in the sport going forward.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23010585
Primary Topic
Sports Analytics and Performance
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
preprint

National Bias and Home Advantage in International Dancesport Judging

Dana Dutchak
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Sports Analytics and Performance
preprint

National Bias and Home Advantage in International Dancesport Judging

Dana Dutchak
preprint en

Abstract

Subjective sports judging is vulnerable to bias, with national bias being the most widespread and well-studied form; however, dancesport has not been empirically studied for this despite the phenomenon being well documented in related sports. This paper investigates national bias among international dancesport adjudicators during the 2024–2026 period, using a novel dataset of 992 judge-level observations from eight international tournaments and a panel OLS model with tournament fixed effects and clustered standard errors. The main findings reveal evidence of in-group favoritism (β = −0.407, p < 0.001) and an unexpected negative home- advantage effect (β = +0.183, p < 0.01). Both findings were directionally robust across three robustness checks. This study is, to my knowledge, the first documented evidence of national bias in dancesport, and its findings are relevant for judging-panel design and transparency in the sport going forward.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Sports Analytics and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.