Validity of Bone Mineral Density Measurements Using SONIALVISION G4: A Quantitative CT-based Evaluation

Abstract Introduction SONIALVISION G4 is a fluoroscopic imaging system equipped with a bone densitometry function calibrated against GE Healthcare dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements. However, evidence supporting the validity of in vivo bone mineral density (BMD) measurements remains limited. This study compared BMD measurements obtained using SONIALVISION G4 with GE DXA reference data and evaluated their validity using quantitative computed tomography (CT). Materials and Methods A total of 887 BMD examinations performed with SONIALVISION G4 in women aged ≥45 years were compared with published Japanese reference data obtained using GE DXA. CT-derived BMD was quantified using a validated deep learning–based method and compared with measurements obtained using SONIALVISION G4 in 30 patients. To validate the CT method against GE DXA, 697 patients from four additional institutions underwent GE DXA and CT. Analyses were conducted for both the femoral neck and total hip. Results Femoral neck BMD generally showed small differences from the reference values, whereas total hip BMD was consistently higher in women aged ≥55 years. CT-derived BMD correlated with SONIALVISION G4 measurements (r = 0.762 and 0.842 for the femoral neck and total hip, respectively), with median absolute differences of 0.022 and 0.133 g/cm 2 . In contrast, CT-derived BMD showed very strong correlations with GE DXA (r = 0.913 and 0.959) and smaller absolute differences (0.043 and 0.033 g/cm 2 ). Conclusion SONIALVISION G4 showed small differences in femoral neck BMD measurements compared with CT-derived measurements but may systematically overestimate total hip BMD. Further validation studies are warranted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00774-026-01766-4
Primary Topic
Bone health and osteoporosis research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Validity of Bone Mineral Density Measurements Using SONIALVISION G4: A Quantitative CT-based Evaluation

Hirokazu Mae, Yuto Nishioka, Makoto Iwasa, Sotaro Kono et al.
Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism
Bone health and osteoporosis research
article

Validity of Bone Mineral Density Measurements Using SONIALVISION G4: A Quantitative CT-based Evaluation

Hirokazu Mae, Yuto Nishioka, Makoto Iwasa, Sotaro Kono, Kazuma Takashima, Seiji Okada, Takeshi Ogawa, Yoshito Otake, Keisuke Uemura, Tetsuro Tani, Ryo Higuchi, Hidetoshi Hamada, Takeshi Ogawa, Kazunori Tamura, Wataru Andō, Tomoki Asano, Junichiro Morita, Yi Gu
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction SONIALVISION G4 is a fluoroscopic imaging system equipped with a bone densitometry function calibrated against GE Healthcare dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements. However, evidence supporting the validity of in vivo bone mineral density (BMD) measurements remains limited. This study compared BMD measurements obtained using SONIALVISION G4 with GE DXA reference data and evaluated their validity using quantitative computed tomography (CT). Materials and Methods A total of 887 BMD examinations performed with SONIALVISION G4 in women aged ≥45 years were compared with published Japanese reference data obtained using GE DXA. CT-derived BMD was quantified using a validated deep learning–based method and compared with measurements obtained using SONIALVISION G4 in 30 patients. To validate the CT method against GE DXA, 697 patients from four additional institutions underwent GE DXA and CT. Analyses were conducted for both the femoral neck and total hip. Results Femoral neck BMD generally showed small differences from the reference values, whereas total hip BMD was consistently higher in women aged ≥55 years. CT-derived BMD correlated with SONIALVISION G4 measurements (r = 0.762 and 0.842 for the femoral neck and total hip, respectively), with median absolute differences of 0.022 and 0.133 g/cm 2 . In contrast, CT-derived BMD showed very strong correlations with GE DXA (r = 0.913 and 0.959) and smaller absolute differences (0.043 and 0.033 g/cm 2 ). Conclusion SONIALVISION G4 showed small differences in femoral neck BMD measurements compared with CT-derived measurements but may systematically overestimate total hip BMD. Further validation studies are warranted.

Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism
Osaka National Hospital (JP), National Hospital Organization Mito Medical Center (JP), Kansai Rosai Hospital (JP), Nara Institute of Science and Technology (JP), The University of Osaka (JP)
Japanese Orthopaedic Association
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Bone health and osteoporosis research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.