When Should a Quantity Have Its Own Dimension? — Uniqueness of Natural Units as a Design Criterion

A kind of quantity may be expressed by pure numbers without loss of information if and only if it possesses a unique natural unit — a focal point on which independent parties would converge without prior communication. Where two or more comparably natural candidates exist, the kind should carry an independent dimension, and the displaced candidates become dimensioned constants of the system. The criterion adjudicates the amount of substance (unique natural unit, the mole legitimate but optional), the plane and solid angles (two incommensurable candidates each; independent dimension required), and the baseless logarithm (three candidates, purely mathematical) within a single framework, and identifies the documented incoherence between the hertz and the radian per second, and the century-old rationalization controversy in electromagnetism, as the predicted failure modes of de-dimensionalizing non-unique kinds. The paper proposes no change to the SI. It examines the Universal Unit System (UUS) / Harmonic System, which made the opposite design choice, as an existence proof. This record contains the English version (canonical) and a Japanese translation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22991635
Primary Topic
Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
preprint

When Should a Quantity Have Its Own Dimension? — Uniqueness of Natural Units as a Design Criterion

Takashi Suga
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
preprint

When Should a Quantity Have Its Own Dimension? — Uniqueness of Natural Units as a Design Criterion

Takashi Suga
preprint en

Abstract

A kind of quantity may be expressed by pure numbers without loss of information if and only if it possesses a unique natural unit — a focal point on which independent parties would converge without prior communication. Where two or more comparably natural candidates exist, the kind should carry an independent dimension, and the displaced candidates become dimensioned constants of the system. The criterion adjudicates the amount of substance (unique natural unit, the mole legitimate but optional), the plane and solid angles (two incommensurable candidates each; independent dimension required), and the baseless logarithm (three candidates, purely mathematical) within a single framework, and identifies the documented incoherence between the hertz and the radian per second, and the century-old rationalization controversy in electromagnetism, as the predicted failure modes of de-dimensionalizing non-unique kinds. The paper proposes no change to the SI. It examines the Universal Unit System (UUS) / Harmonic System, which made the opposite design choice, as an existence proof. This record contains the English version (canonical) and a Japanese translation.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.