Self-reported outcomes and associated factors among patients with cancer completing Mongolian mind-body interaction therapy: a cross-sectional study

Introduction Patients with malignant tumors face physical illness and psychological distress. Mongolian mind-body interaction therapy (MMBIT) is a group-based intervention combining modern psychology with traditional Mongolian medicine. As a complementary oncology approach, MMBIT supports conventional evidence-based care. This study characterized the demographic and clinical profiles of MMBIT participants and identified therapeutic factors associated with reported benefits. Methods A cross-sectional analysis included 1590 patients with cancer who completed the 21-session MMBIT course. A 121-item questionnaire assessed self-reported outcomes across six domains: physical symptoms, psychological symptoms, positive emotions, life conditions, health knowledge, and perceived treatment efficacy. One-sample t-tests, Pearson correlations, nonparametric group comparisons, and multivariable linear regression were used. Results Participants reported favorable outcomes across all six domains, with mean scores significantly above the neutral midpoint of the 5-point scale (all P < 0.001). The highest ratings were observed for health knowledge (4.55 [0.58]), life conditions (4.43 [0.67]), and positive emotions (4.35 [0.70]). Greater MMBIT engagement, particularly video-based participation, was positively associated with more favorable self-reported outcomes (r = 0.21–0.34). Farmers, herdsmen, and participants with lower educational attainment reported higher outcome scores (P < 0.001); lower educational attainment remained the strongest independent predictor after multivariable adjustment. Participants reported lower use of surgery and radiation/chemotherapy and greater use of Mongolian medicine following MMBIT; however, treatment appropriateness and clinical indications were not assessed, so these findings should not be interpreted as evidence that MMBIT can replace conventional treatment. Conclusions MMBIT participation was associated with favorable self-reported outcomes across multiple health domains among patients with cancer. However, the cross-sectional design, reliance on self-reported measures, and selection bias from including only therapy completers limit causal interpretation. Future prospective controlled studies incorporating objective clinical outcomes are needed to validate these findings and clarify MMBIT’s potential role as a culturally grounded supportive care intervention.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine and Technology Assessment
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26599/ecmta.2026.9570045
Primary Topic
Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Self-reported outcomes and associated factors among patients with cancer completing Mongolian mind-body interaction therapy: a cross-sectional study

Sarnai Arlud, Bao-Jun De, Zhiqiang Li, Hong-Yun Wu et al.
Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine and Technology Assessment
Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
article

Self-reported outcomes and associated factors among patients with cancer completing Mongolian mind-body interaction therapy: a cross-sectional study

Sarnai Arlud, Bao-Jun De, Zhiqiang Li, Hong-Yun Wu, Narisu De, Caihela Hushud, Wen-Feng Bao, Da-hua Wang, Jun Fang, Nagongbilige, Jing-peng Yang, Li-ping Gong, Zhao-lan Liu, Haorile Chagan-Yasutan, Yu Du
article en

Abstract

Introduction Patients with malignant tumors face physical illness and psychological distress. Mongolian mind-body interaction therapy (MMBIT) is a group-based intervention combining modern psychology with traditional Mongolian medicine. As a complementary oncology approach, MMBIT supports conventional evidence-based care. This study characterized the demographic and clinical profiles of MMBIT participants and identified therapeutic factors associated with reported benefits. Methods A cross-sectional analysis included 1590 patients with cancer who completed the 21-session MMBIT course. A 121-item questionnaire assessed self-reported outcomes across six domains: physical symptoms, psychological symptoms, positive emotions, life conditions, health knowledge, and perceived treatment efficacy. One-sample t-tests, Pearson correlations, nonparametric group comparisons, and multivariable linear regression were used. Results Participants reported favorable outcomes across all six domains, with mean scores significantly above the neutral midpoint of the 5-point scale (all P < 0.001). The highest ratings were observed for health knowledge (4.55 [0.58]), life conditions (4.43 [0.67]), and positive emotions (4.35 [0.70]). Greater MMBIT engagement, particularly video-based participation, was positively associated with more favorable self-reported outcomes (r = 0.21–0.34). Farmers, herdsmen, and participants with lower educational attainment reported higher outcome scores (P < 0.001); lower educational attainment remained the strongest independent predictor after multivariable adjustment. Participants reported lower use of surgery and radiation/chemotherapy and greater use of Mongolian medicine following MMBIT; however, treatment appropriateness and clinical indications were not assessed, so these findings should not be interpreted as evidence that MMBIT can replace conventional treatment. Conclusions MMBIT participation was associated with favorable self-reported outcomes across multiple health domains among patients with cancer. However, the cross-sectional design, reliance on self-reported measures, and selection bias from including only therapy completers limit causal interpretation. Future prospective controlled studies incorporating objective clinical outcomes are needed to validate these findings and clarify MMBIT’s potential role as a culturally grounded supportive care intervention.

Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine and Technology Assessment
Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications (CN), Beijing University of Chinese Medicine (CN), Capital Medical University (CN), Beijing Normal University (CN), Inner Mongolia International Mongolian Hospital (CN), Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN), Inner Mongolia Medical University (CN), Renmin University of China (CN), University of Colorado Denver (US)
Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.