Analytical Performance Evaluation of the Sysmex XR-9000 Hematology Analyzer in a Clinical Laboratory Setting

Background: Automated hematology analyzers are essential for clinical diagnostics.We evaluated the analytical performance of the Sysmex XR-9000 (Sysmex Corporation, Kobe, Japan) by comparing it with the XN-9000 (Sysmex Corporation) system.Methods: Analytical performance of the XR series was evaluated including carryover, within-laboratory precision, linearity, and sensitivity.Method comparison was performed using clinical samples for complete blood count (N=120), reticulocytes (N=74), eosinophil count (N=337), and hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPC; N=40, including 13 peripheral blood stem cell products) using Passing-Bablok regression analysis and Bland-Altman analysis.Flagging performance was evaluated using 355 samples with manual differential counts as the reference method.Overall agreement was assessed using manufacturer recommended cutoffs and reference intervals were verified in 40 healthy individuals.Results: Carryover rates were ≤ 0.13%, within-laboratory precision met predefined acceptance criteria, and linearity was confirmed across the analytical measuring intervals (r>0.999).Method comparison showed regression slopes ranging from 0.991 to 1.034 for major hematologic parameters, including white blood cell (WBC), red blood cell, and WBC differential counts.For HPC enumeration, correlation coefficients were 0.964 and 0.985 for absolute counts and percentages, respectively.Flagging performance varied by specific parameter: the 'IG Present (immature granulocyte)' flag showed 100.0%sensitivity and 83.9% specificity, while morphological flags like 'Blasts/Abn Lympho?' showed 65.0% sensitivity and 70.4% specificity.Established reference intervals were verified.Conclusions: In this first Korean evaluation, the Sysmex XR-9000 showed acceptable analytical performance for routine hematology parameters and HPC enumeration with precision, linearity, and method comparison results comparable to those of the XN-9000.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Laboratory Medicine Online
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47429/lmo.2026.16.4.324
Primary Topic
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Analytical Performance Evaluation of the Sysmex XR-9000 Hematology Analyzer in a Clinical Laboratory Setting

Sang Mee Hwang, 김세승
Laboratory Medicine Online
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
article

Analytical Performance Evaluation of the Sysmex XR-9000 Hematology Analyzer in a Clinical Laboratory Setting

Sang Mee Hwang, 김세승
article en

Abstract

Background: Automated hematology analyzers are essential for clinical diagnostics.We evaluated the analytical performance of the Sysmex XR-9000 (Sysmex Corporation, Kobe, Japan) by comparing it with the XN-9000 (Sysmex Corporation) system.Methods: Analytical performance of the XR series was evaluated including carryover, within-laboratory precision, linearity, and sensitivity.Method comparison was performed using clinical samples for complete blood count (N=120), reticulocytes (N=74), eosinophil count (N=337), and hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPC; N=40, including 13 peripheral blood stem cell products) using Passing-Bablok regression analysis and Bland-Altman analysis.Flagging performance was evaluated using 355 samples with manual differential counts as the reference method.Overall agreement was assessed using manufacturer recommended cutoffs and reference intervals were verified in 40 healthy individuals.Results: Carryover rates were ≤ 0.13%, within-laboratory precision met predefined acceptance criteria, and linearity was confirmed across the analytical measuring intervals (r>0.999).Method comparison showed regression slopes ranging from 0.991 to 1.034 for major hematologic parameters, including white blood cell (WBC), red blood cell, and WBC differential counts.For HPC enumeration, correlation coefficients were 0.964 and 0.985 for absolute counts and percentages, respectively.Flagging performance varied by specific parameter: the 'IG Present (immature granulocyte)' flag showed 100.0%sensitivity and 83.9% specificity, while morphological flags like 'Blasts/Abn Lympho?' showed 65.0% sensitivity and 70.4% specificity.Established reference intervals were verified.Conclusions: In this first Korean evaluation, the Sysmex XR-9000 showed acceptable analytical performance for routine hematology parameters and HPC enumeration with precision, linearity, and method comparison results comparable to those of the XN-9000.

Laboratory Medicine OnlineVol. 16(4)
Seoul National University (KR), Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.