Physiological load and circadian organization of cardiovascular, autonomic and thermal functions in dry and lactating ewes assessed using biologgers

Context Lactation is a physiologically demanding period in sheep that is characterized by an increase in metabolic and cardiovascular requirements. Although physiological changes during lactation have been well documented, less is known about how lactation affects the circadian organization of cardiovascular and autonomic functions. Aim The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of lactation on physiological load and circadian organization in adult ewes. Methods Five lactating ewes that were in the second to third week of lactation with lambs present, were compared to seven dry ewes. Subcutaneous biologgers recorded body temperature (T), heart rate (HR), and heart rate variability (HRV; standard deviation of normal-to-normal R–R intervals [SDNN] and root mean square of consecutive deviations between normal heartbeats [RMSSD]) every 30 min for 20 days. Raw physiological data and circadian parameters derived from 24-h cosinor models, including midline-estimating statistic of rhythm (MESOR), amplitude, acrophase, robustness, and circadianity, were evaluated. Key results Lactating ewes exhibited higher T and HR than dry ewes. SDNN was lower in lactating ewes, whereas RMSSD showed a non-significant tendency to be lower. Both groups exhibited robust 24-h rhythms in HR, although rhythms in lactating ewes had higher MESOR, amplitude, and robustness. Circadian organization of HRV was less consistent in lactating ewes, with fewer animals exhibiting significant circadian rhythms and greater inter-individual variability than in dry ewes. Dry ewes exhibited a lower physiological load and a more stable and coherent circadian organization than did lactating ewes. Conclusion Lactation in ewes is associated with an increase in cardiovascular and thermal load, a reduction in autonomic variability, and marked changes in circadian regulation, particularly autonomic rhythmicity. Implications Integrating circadian analysis with conventional physiological measurements provides a more comprehensive assessment of physiological status and might provide sensitive indicators of functional strain during lactation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Animal Production Science
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1071/an26039
Primary Topic
Reproductive Physiology in Livestock
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Physiological load and circadian organization of cardiovascular, autonomic and thermal functions in dry and lactating ewes assessed using biologgers

Francisco Canto, J.A. Abecia
Animal Production Science
Reproductive Physiology in Livestock
article

Physiological load and circadian organization of cardiovascular, autonomic and thermal functions in dry and lactating ewes assessed using biologgers

Francisco Canto, J.A. Abecia
article en

Abstract

Context Lactation is a physiologically demanding period in sheep that is characterized by an increase in metabolic and cardiovascular requirements. Although physiological changes during lactation have been well documented, less is known about how lactation affects the circadian organization of cardiovascular and autonomic functions. Aim The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of lactation on physiological load and circadian organization in adult ewes. Methods Five lactating ewes that were in the second to third week of lactation with lambs present, were compared to seven dry ewes. Subcutaneous biologgers recorded body temperature (T), heart rate (HR), and heart rate variability (HRV; standard deviation of normal-to-normal R–R intervals [SDNN] and root mean square of consecutive deviations between normal heartbeats [RMSSD]) every 30 min for 20 days. Raw physiological data and circadian parameters derived from 24-h cosinor models, including midline-estimating statistic of rhythm (MESOR), amplitude, acrophase, robustness, and circadianity, were evaluated. Key results Lactating ewes exhibited higher T and HR than dry ewes. SDNN was lower in lactating ewes, whereas RMSSD showed a non-significant tendency to be lower. Both groups exhibited robust 24-h rhythms in HR, although rhythms in lactating ewes had higher MESOR, amplitude, and robustness. Circadian organization of HRV was less consistent in lactating ewes, with fewer animals exhibiting significant circadian rhythms and greater inter-individual variability than in dry ewes. Dry ewes exhibited a lower physiological load and a more stable and coherent circadian organization than did lactating ewes. Conclusion Lactation in ewes is associated with an increase in cardiovascular and thermal load, a reduction in autonomic variability, and marked changes in circadian regulation, particularly autonomic rhythmicity. Implications Integrating circadian analysis with conventional physiological measurements provides a more comprehensive assessment of physiological status and might provide sensitive indicators of functional strain during lactation.

Animal Production ScienceVol. 66(14)
Universidad de Zaragoza (ES), Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias (CL), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Aragón (ES), Instituto Aragonés de Ciencias de la Salud (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Reproductive Physiology in Livestock
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.