ESTIMATING THE IMPLICATIONS OF HEALTH EXPENDITURE, GOVERNANCE AND ECONOMIC CONTEXT ON PANDEMIC PREPAREDNESS IN AFRICA

Background The COVID-19 pandemic exposed critical vulnerabilities in African health systems, revealing that pandemic preparedness is determined not merely by technical capacity but by the complex interplay of health expenditure, governance quality, and economic context. The paper investigates the implications of pandemic preparedness on health system resilience in African countries, the mediating role of health expenditure and the moderating influence of economic development. Methods The study first undertook an analytical situational analysis followed by a cross-country analysis of data from 195 countries the study employed multivariate linear regression models with robust standard errors, incorporating the Global Health Security (GHS). The study tested mediation pathways, interaction effects between preparedness and income, and conducted multiple robustness checks including alternative outcomes and outlier adjustment. Results Globally, the GHS Index showed a strong positive association with reported COVID-19 mortality (β = 43.14, p < 0.001), even after extensive controls the preparedness paradox. However, health expenditure per capita demonstrated a consistent protective effect (β = -0.15 to -0.18, p < 0.01), while governance was protective for excess mortality (β = -60.24, p < 0.01). Critically, a significant negative interaction between preparedness and income emerged (β = -0.37 standardized, p < 0.001), indicating that the positive preparedness-mortality relationship weakens as income rises. In Africa, preparedness effects were weaker and not robust across specifications; only life expectancy consistently predicted mortality (β = 0.12, p < 0.001 in log model). VIF diagnostics confirmed no severe multicollinearity (mean VIF = 2.43 global, 2.36 Africa). Conclusion Pandemic preparedness as measured by the GHS Index does not translate into lower mortality; rather, its association with outcomes is context-dependent, moderated by economic development. In Africa, structural and demographic factors outweigh formal preparedness metrics. Policy should prioritize sustained health financing and institutional capacity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
F1000Research
Published
2026-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.185776.1
Primary Topic
Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

ESTIMATING THE IMPLICATIONS OF HEALTH EXPENDITURE, GOVERNANCE AND ECONOMIC CONTEXT ON PANDEMIC PREPAREDNESS IN AFRICA

Kellen Kiambati, Margaret Kosgei, Nicholas Mawira
F1000Research
Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research
article

ESTIMATING THE IMPLICATIONS OF HEALTH EXPENDITURE, GOVERNANCE AND ECONOMIC CONTEXT ON PANDEMIC PREPAREDNESS IN AFRICA

Kellen Kiambati, Margaret Kosgei, Nicholas Mawira
article en

Abstract

Background The COVID-19 pandemic exposed critical vulnerabilities in African health systems, revealing that pandemic preparedness is determined not merely by technical capacity but by the complex interplay of health expenditure, governance quality, and economic context. The paper investigates the implications of pandemic preparedness on health system resilience in African countries, the mediating role of health expenditure and the moderating influence of economic development. Methods The study first undertook an analytical situational analysis followed by a cross-country analysis of data from 195 countries the study employed multivariate linear regression models with robust standard errors, incorporating the Global Health Security (GHS). The study tested mediation pathways, interaction effects between preparedness and income, and conducted multiple robustness checks including alternative outcomes and outlier adjustment. Results Globally, the GHS Index showed a strong positive association with reported COVID-19 mortality (β = 43.14, p < 0.001), even after extensive controls the preparedness paradox. However, health expenditure per capita demonstrated a consistent protective effect (β = -0.15 to -0.18, p < 0.01), while governance was protective for excess mortality (β = -60.24, p < 0.01). Critically, a significant negative interaction between preparedness and income emerged (β = -0.37 standardized, p < 0.001), indicating that the positive preparedness-mortality relationship weakens as income rises. In Africa, preparedness effects were weaker and not robust across specifications; only life expectancy consistently predicted mortality (β = 0.12, p < 0.001 in log model). VIF diagnostics confirmed no severe multicollinearity (mean VIF = 2.43 global, 2.36 Africa). Conclusion Pandemic preparedness as measured by the GHS Index does not translate into lower mortality; rather, its association with outcomes is context-dependent, moderated by economic development. In Africa, structural and demographic factors outweigh formal preparedness metrics. Policy should prioritize sustained health financing and institutional capacity.

F1000ResearchVol. 15
Kenyatta University (KE), Karatina University (KE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.