Penile Strangulation by Four Stainless Steel Rings Requiring Multiple Approaches for Removal: A Case Report

ABSTRACT Introduction Penile strangulation is a rare urological emergency requiring prompt intervention. Stainless steel rings may resist conventional cutters because of their rigidity. Case Presentation A 62‐year‐old man presented with severe penile pain after applying four stainless steel rings to treat phimosis. One ring was trapped at the coronal sulcus and three at the penile base. The glans was congested with partial blistering. Initial attempts using the string method and manual ring cutters failed. Aspiration of approximately 10 mL of blood from the glans allowed removal of the distal ring. The remaining rings required general anesthesia, corporal blood aspiration, temporary penile‐base compression, partial cutting of one ring, and manual decompression. All rings were removed within approximately 6 h after application. No clinical evidence of urethral injury was found, and no sensory disturbance was noted. Conclusion A stepwise approach may be required for penile strangulation caused by multiple stainless steel rings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IJU Case Reports
Published
2026-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/iju5.70265
Primary Topic
Genital Health and Disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Penile Strangulation by Four Stainless Steel Rings Requiring Multiple Approaches for Removal: A Case Report

Yoshifumi Miyauchi, Risako Watanabe, Masayuki Kurokawa, Toru Sugihara et al.
IJU Case Reports
Genital Health and Disease
article

Penile Strangulation by Four Stainless Steel Rings Requiring Multiple Approaches for Removal: A Case Report

Yoshifumi Miyauchi, Risako Watanabe, Masayuki Kurokawa, Toru Sugihara, Satoshi Ando, Hayato Hoshina, Tetsuya Fujimura, Hiroto Kishino, Daichi Hirata, Eiichiro Takaoka
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction Penile strangulation is a rare urological emergency requiring prompt intervention. Stainless steel rings may resist conventional cutters because of their rigidity. Case Presentation A 62‐year‐old man presented with severe penile pain after applying four stainless steel rings to treat phimosis. One ring was trapped at the coronal sulcus and three at the penile base. The glans was congested with partial blistering. Initial attempts using the string method and manual ring cutters failed. Aspiration of approximately 10 mL of blood from the glans allowed removal of the distal ring. The remaining rings required general anesthesia, corporal blood aspiration, temporary penile‐base compression, partial cutting of one ring, and manual decompression. All rings were removed within approximately 6 h after application. No clinical evidence of urethral injury was found, and no sensory disturbance was noted. Conclusion A stepwise approach may be required for penile strangulation caused by multiple stainless steel rings.

IJU Case ReportsVol. 9(6)
Jichi Medical University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Genital Health and Disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Penile Strangulation by Four Stainless Steel Rings Requiring Multiple Approaches for Removal: A Case Report — Yoshifumi Miyauchi, Risako Watanabe, et al. · IJU Case Reports (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS