Evaluating the Accuracy and Reliability of StudyMate AI for Document-Based Question Answering and Multiple-Choice Question Generation

This study evaluates the accuracy and reliability of StudyMate AI, an educational AI system designed to answer questions and generate multiple-choice questions from student-provided educational materials. The evaluation used three educational documents covering Physics, Chemistry, and Computer Science. Two controlled experiments were conducted. The first evaluated document-based question answering using nine predefined questions and reference answers derived from the source materials. The second evaluated multiple-choice question generation using 45 generated questions across three subjects and three requested difficulty levels. StudyMate correctly answered 8 of 9 question-answering questions (88.9%). The only incorrect response occurred in a Hard Physics question involving an isochoric process, where Celsius temperatures were used directly instead of being converted to Kelvin. For multiple-choice question generation, all 45 generated questions were evaluated as content-correct, source-grounded, and having unique correct answers under the predefined evaluation criteria. The repository contains the research paper and the evaluation datasets used in the controlled experiments. The source educational materials are not included in this record.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22979817
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
preprint

Evaluating the Accuracy and Reliability of StudyMate AI for Document-Based Question Answering and Multiple-Choice Question Generation

Sakshyam Niraula
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Topic Modeling
preprint

Evaluating the Accuracy and Reliability of StudyMate AI for Document-Based Question Answering and Multiple-Choice Question Generation

Sakshyam Niraula
preprint en

Abstract

This study evaluates the accuracy and reliability of StudyMate AI, an educational AI system designed to answer questions and generate multiple-choice questions from student-provided educational materials. The evaluation used three educational documents covering Physics, Chemistry, and Computer Science. Two controlled experiments were conducted. The first evaluated document-based question answering using nine predefined questions and reference answers derived from the source materials. The second evaluated multiple-choice question generation using 45 generated questions across three subjects and three requested difficulty levels. StudyMate correctly answered 8 of 9 question-answering questions (88.9%). The only incorrect response occurred in a Hard Physics question involving an isochoric process, where Celsius temperatures were used directly instead of being converted to Kelvin. For multiple-choice question generation, all 45 generated questions were evaluated as content-correct, source-grounded, and having unique correct answers under the predefined evaluation criteria. The repository contains the research paper and the evaluation datasets used in the controlled experiments. The source educational materials are not included in this record.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Nobel Academy (NP)
Quality Education
Topic Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.