Who Gets Referred for What? Large Scale Analysis of Clinical, Socioeconomic and Demographic Drivers Within Electronic Optometry Referrals

Abstract Objective To provide the first large-scale analysis of Electronic Eyecare Referral System (EeRS) data, examining referral patterns, demographic differences and geographical variation by socioeconomic deprivation overall. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted of 104,190 referrals submitted via the National Health Service (NHS) England North West’s EeRS between June 2022 and May 2024. Descriptive analyses summarised referral destinations and putative optometric diagnoses. Chi-squared tests with Bonferroni correction examined sex differences across referral endpoints. Multivariable logistic regression assessed associations between deprivation (Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) decile) and condition-specific referral odds, adjusting for age, sex and ethnicity. Results Most referrals were directed to ophthalmology in secondary care (71.6%). The most common referral endpoints were glaucoma (12.2%), other medical retina (11.6%) and YAG laser capsulotomy (11.1%). Referrals within primary care accounted for 18.2%, predominantly referrals to general practice (15.0%), while referrals to glaucoma referral filtering comprised 3.0% of all referrals. Significant sex differences in referral distribution across several subspecialty endpoints were observed ( p < 0.003). Deprivation-related and geographical variation was evident, with higher odds of cataract (Odds Ratio (OR) per IMD decile 0.97, 95% CI 0.97–0.98) and paediatric binocular vision referrals (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.94–0.98) in more deprived areas, whereas vitreoretinal, adult binocular vision and other medical retina referrals were more common in less deprived areas. Conclusions Electronic optometry referrals showed substantial variation by condition and area-level socioeconomic context. Linking referral data to deprivation measures may help identify variation in referral activity and support strategies to improve eye examination uptake and optimise referral pathways.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics
Published
2026-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44402-026-00198-x
Primary Topic
Glaucoma and retinal disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Who Gets Referred for What? Large Scale Analysis of Clinical, Socioeconomic and Demographic Drivers Within Electronic Optometry Referrals

Glen P. Martin, Ketan R. Parmar, Matthew Jinkinson, Robert Anthony Harper et al.
Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics
Glaucoma and retinal disorders
article

Who Gets Referred for What? Large Scale Analysis of Clinical, Socioeconomic and Demographic Drivers Within Electronic Optometry Referrals

Glen P. Martin, Ketan R. Parmar, Matthew Jinkinson, Robert Anthony Harper, Abdullah F. Alotaibi, Philip B. Morgan
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective To provide the first large-scale analysis of Electronic Eyecare Referral System (EeRS) data, examining referral patterns, demographic differences and geographical variation by socioeconomic deprivation overall. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted of 104,190 referrals submitted via the National Health Service (NHS) England North West’s EeRS between June 2022 and May 2024. Descriptive analyses summarised referral destinations and putative optometric diagnoses. Chi-squared tests with Bonferroni correction examined sex differences across referral endpoints. Multivariable logistic regression assessed associations between deprivation (Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) decile) and condition-specific referral odds, adjusting for age, sex and ethnicity. Results Most referrals were directed to ophthalmology in secondary care (71.6%). The most common referral endpoints were glaucoma (12.2%), other medical retina (11.6%) and YAG laser capsulotomy (11.1%). Referrals within primary care accounted for 18.2%, predominantly referrals to general practice (15.0%), while referrals to glaucoma referral filtering comprised 3.0% of all referrals. Significant sex differences in referral distribution across several subspecialty endpoints were observed ( p < 0.003). Deprivation-related and geographical variation was evident, with higher odds of cataract (Odds Ratio (OR) per IMD decile 0.97, 95% CI 0.97–0.98) and paediatric binocular vision referrals (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.94–0.98) in more deprived areas, whereas vitreoretinal, adult binocular vision and other medical retina referrals were more common in less deprived areas. Conclusions Electronic optometry referrals showed substantial variation by condition and area-level socioeconomic context. Linking referral data to deprivation measures may help identify variation in referral activity and support strategies to improve eye examination uptake and optimise referral pathways.

Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Glaucoma and retinal disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.