A COMPARATIVE REVIEW OF METHODS FOR FORECASTING AMBIENT AIR QUALITY INDICATORS USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

The paper compares 21 reviews on forecasting the air quality index (AQI) and pollutant concentrations with machine learning. A survey of 155 studies from 2011-2021 serves as the reference source and is complemented by open-access reviews from 2018-2026. The reviews and the primary studies they cover are summarised by country, database, publication year, model and metric. Three stages in the development of the methods are identified, the reasons for disagreements between reviews are explained, early studies from Uzbekistan are outlined, and recommendations on model selection for the region are given. The selection of the reviews is documented according to PRISMA 2020, and each review is appraised for risk of bias. A model selection criterion is also proposed that combines a skill score against the persistence forecast, a data-sufficiency index, the stability of feature attributions and computing cost, on hourly data from three stations in Tashkent it picked the best model family in 5 of 9 cases and gave no recommendation for the 24-hour horizon, where no model was reliable.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22979498
Primary Topic
Advanced Technologies in Various Fields
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

A COMPARATIVE REVIEW OF METHODS FOR FORECASTING AMBIENT AIR QUALITY INDICATORS USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

Islom Yalgoshev
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Advanced Technologies in Various Fields
article

A COMPARATIVE REVIEW OF METHODS FOR FORECASTING AMBIENT AIR QUALITY INDICATORS USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

Islom Yalgoshev
article en

Abstract

The paper compares 21 reviews on forecasting the air quality index (AQI) and pollutant concentrations with machine learning. A survey of 155 studies from 2011-2021 serves as the reference source and is complemented by open-access reviews from 2018-2026. The reviews and the primary studies they cover are summarised by country, database, publication year, model and metric. Three stages in the development of the methods are identified, the reasons for disagreements between reviews are explained, early studies from Uzbekistan are outlined, and recommendations on model selection for the region are given. The selection of the reviews is documented according to PRISMA 2020, and each review is appraised for risk of bias. A model selection criterion is also proposed that combines a skill score against the persistence forecast, a data-sufficiency index, the stability of feature attributions and computing cost, on hourly data from three stations in Tashkent it picked the best model family in 5 of 9 cases and gave no recommendation for the 24-hour horizon, where no model was reliable.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Samarkand State University named after Sharof Rashidov (UZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Advanced Technologies in Various Fields
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.