A Semi‐Interpretable Multimodal Model Combining Electronic Health Records and Chest X‐Rays for COVID ‐19‐Related Death Prediction

ABSTRACT Purpose Prognostic models can benefit from integrating heterogeneous data sources. While deep learning‐based multimodal models often improve predictive performance, their limited interpretability remains a barrier to clinical adoption. Moreover, achieving robust generalization with such models typically requires large and diverse datasets, which are not always available in clinical research. This study evaluated whether a late fusion model combining traditional statistical approaches with deep learning models could rival deep learning‐only multimodal models while preserving interpretability to support clinical use. Methods We conducted a retrospective single‐center cohort study of 965 hospitalized patients with laboratory‐confirmed SARS‐CoV‐2 infection who underwent frontal chest X‐ray imaging during hospitalization between March 2020 and January 2022. Of these, 64 (6.6%) died. Structured clinical data and chest X‐ray images were used to predict COVID‐19‐related death. We developed unimodal baseline models and two multimodal approaches: a deep learning‐based joint fusion model and a late fusion model leveraging logistic regression to combine predictions from the best‐performing models for every data modality. Given the limited sample size and class imbalance, performance was evaluated using repeated five‐fold cross validation. Results The late fusion model achieved the best overall performance, with the highest median test AUPRC of 0.363 (IQR 0.271–0.384) across cross validation folds, outperforming unimodal baselines based on structured clinical data or images alone. The late fusion model also outperformed the joint fusion model, achieving, respectively, a 3.1% and 3.6% relative improvement in AUPRC and Brier score on pooled out‐of‐sample predictions and yielding the highest balanced F1‐score. Moreover, it preserved partial interpretability by linking predictions to clinically meaningful variables such as age and comorbidities and enabling image‐based predictions to be traced back to radiographic abnormalities. Conclusions Late fusion models integrating statistical models for clinical data with deep learning for image classification can enhance prognostic performance over unimodal models without fully sacrificing interpretability. In settings with limited data, they may also outperform deep learning‐based joint fusion models. These findings support late fusion as a promising strategy that warrants prospective evaluation and external validation before clinical implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Expert Systems
Published
2026-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.70440
Primary Topic
COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

A Semi‐Interpretable Multimodal Model Combining Electronic Health Records and Chest X‐Rays for COVID ‐19‐Related Death Prediction

María José Legarreta, Lander Rodríguez, Irantzu Barrio, José María Quintana et al.
Expert Systems
COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
article

A Semi‐Interpretable Multimodal Model Combining Electronic Health Records and Chest X‐Rays for COVID ‐19‐Related Death Prediction

María José Legarreta, Lander Rodríguez, Irantzu Barrio, José María Quintana, Nere Larrea, Fernando García-García, Jose Javier Echevarria‐Uraga, Javier Del Ser
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose Prognostic models can benefit from integrating heterogeneous data sources. While deep learning‐based multimodal models often improve predictive performance, their limited interpretability remains a barrier to clinical adoption. Moreover, achieving robust generalization with such models typically requires large and diverse datasets, which are not always available in clinical research. This study evaluated whether a late fusion model combining traditional statistical approaches with deep learning models could rival deep learning‐only multimodal models while preserving interpretability to support clinical use. Methods We conducted a retrospective single‐center cohort study of 965 hospitalized patients with laboratory‐confirmed SARS‐CoV‐2 infection who underwent frontal chest X‐ray imaging during hospitalization between March 2020 and January 2022. Of these, 64 (6.6%) died. Structured clinical data and chest X‐ray images were used to predict COVID‐19‐related death. We developed unimodal baseline models and two multimodal approaches: a deep learning‐based joint fusion model and a late fusion model leveraging logistic regression to combine predictions from the best‐performing models for every data modality. Given the limited sample size and class imbalance, performance was evaluated using repeated five‐fold cross validation. Results The late fusion model achieved the best overall performance, with the highest median test AUPRC of 0.363 (IQR 0.271–0.384) across cross validation folds, outperforming unimodal baselines based on structured clinical data or images alone. The late fusion model also outperformed the joint fusion model, achieving, respectively, a 3.1% and 3.6% relative improvement in AUPRC and Brier score on pooled out‐of‐sample predictions and yielding the highest balanced F1‐score. Moreover, it preserved partial interpretability by linking predictions to clinically meaningful variables such as age and comorbidities and enabling image‐based predictions to be traced back to radiographic abnormalities. Conclusions Late fusion models integrating statistical models for clinical data with deep learning for image classification can enhance prognostic performance over unimodal models without fully sacrificing interpretability. In settings with limited data, they may also outperform deep learning‐based joint fusion models. These findings support late fusion as a promising strategy that warrants prospective evaluation and external validation before clinical implementation.

Expert SystemsVol. 43(11)
University of the Basque Country (ES), Basque Center for Applied Mathematics (ES), BioCruces Health research Institute (ES), Red de Investigación en Actividades Preventivas y Promoción de la Salud (ES), Hospital de Galdakao (ES), Association of Electronic and Information Technologies (ES), Bioef - Fundación Vasca de Innovación e Investigación Sanitarias (ES), Research Network (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.