Association of antiplatelet and anticoagulant use history with 30-day outcomes after lumbar puncture: a population-based retrospective study

Abstract Objective The safety of lumbar puncture in patients with a history of anticoagulant or antiplatelet use remains incompletely characterized. This study evaluated the coded occurrence of blood patch, paralysis, and spinal decompression within 30 days of lumbar puncture using a retrospective database. Methods TriNetX, a database that houses clinical information from multiple healthcare entities, was used to carry out retrospective data collection and analysis. Data from patients with a history of antiplatelet use and anticoagulant use were collected separately. The timeline for outcomes of blood patch, paralysis, and spinal decompression started on the day of the first lumbar puncture and ended on the 30th day after the procedure. Propensity score matching was followed by statistical risk analyses. Results A total of 13,310 patients were identified after propensity score matching for both lumbar puncture patients with antiplatelet use and lumbar puncture patients without antiplatelet, anticoagulant, heparin, or low-molecular-weight heparin use. Blood patch (OR [95% CI], 0.705 [0.563–0.882]) showed lower odds of association, while paralysis (OR [95% CI], 1.404 [1.097–1.798]) and spinal decompression (OR [95% CI], 2.225 [1.183–4.185]) showed greater odds of association; all were statistically significant. The corresponding absolute risk differences were 0.3% for paralysis and 0.1% for spinal decompression. A total of 25,788 patients were identified for both lumbar puncture patients with anticoagulant use and those without blood-thinner use after propensity score matching. Blood patch (OR [95% CI], 0.394 [0.332–0.467]) and spinal decompression (OR [95% CI], 0.659 [0.389–1.115]) showed lower odds of association, while paralysis (OR [95% CI], 1.154 [0.943–1.414]) showed greater odds of association; only blood patch was statistically significant. Conclusions Among patients with a history of antiplatelet use, coded paralysis and spinal decompression within 30 days of lumbar puncture were associated with higher odds, although the absolute risk differences were small at 0.3% and 0.1%, respectively. Anticoagulant use history was not significantly associated with either paralysis or spinal decompression. Blood patch use was significantly lower in both exposure analyses. Since the TriNetX database cannot establish whether these coded outcomes were caused by lumbar puncture, these associations should be interpreted cautiously and require chart-level confirmation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Neurologica Belgica
Published
2026-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-026-03197-4
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Association of antiplatelet and anticoagulant use history with 30-day outcomes after lumbar puncture: a population-based retrospective study

Mason T. Stoltzfus, Elias Rizk, Andrea Shehaj, David R Hallan et al.
Acta Neurologica Belgica
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
article

Association of antiplatelet and anticoagulant use history with 30-day outcomes after lumbar puncture: a population-based retrospective study

Mason T. Stoltzfus, Elias Rizk, Andrea Shehaj, David R Hallan, Manuel Bita, Naomi B. Gizaw, Kunal Koka, David Millar, Jinpyo Hong, Kyle Schantz
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective The safety of lumbar puncture in patients with a history of anticoagulant or antiplatelet use remains incompletely characterized. This study evaluated the coded occurrence of blood patch, paralysis, and spinal decompression within 30 days of lumbar puncture using a retrospective database. Methods TriNetX, a database that houses clinical information from multiple healthcare entities, was used to carry out retrospective data collection and analysis. Data from patients with a history of antiplatelet use and anticoagulant use were collected separately. The timeline for outcomes of blood patch, paralysis, and spinal decompression started on the day of the first lumbar puncture and ended on the 30th day after the procedure. Propensity score matching was followed by statistical risk analyses. Results A total of 13,310 patients were identified after propensity score matching for both lumbar puncture patients with antiplatelet use and lumbar puncture patients without antiplatelet, anticoagulant, heparin, or low-molecular-weight heparin use. Blood patch (OR [95% CI], 0.705 [0.563–0.882]) showed lower odds of association, while paralysis (OR [95% CI], 1.404 [1.097–1.798]) and spinal decompression (OR [95% CI], 2.225 [1.183–4.185]) showed greater odds of association; all were statistically significant. The corresponding absolute risk differences were 0.3% for paralysis and 0.1% for spinal decompression. A total of 25,788 patients were identified for both lumbar puncture patients with anticoagulant use and those without blood-thinner use after propensity score matching. Blood patch (OR [95% CI], 0.394 [0.332–0.467]) and spinal decompression (OR [95% CI], 0.659 [0.389–1.115]) showed lower odds of association, while paralysis (OR [95% CI], 1.154 [0.943–1.414]) showed greater odds of association; only blood patch was statistically significant. Conclusions Among patients with a history of antiplatelet use, coded paralysis and spinal decompression within 30 days of lumbar puncture were associated with higher odds, although the absolute risk differences were small at 0.3% and 0.1%, respectively. Anticoagulant use history was not significantly associated with either paralysis or spinal decompression. Blood patch use was significantly lower in both exposure analyses. Since the TriNetX database cannot establish whether these coded outcomes were caused by lumbar puncture, these associations should be interpreted cautiously and require chart-level confirmation.

Acta Neurologica Belgica
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.