Organizations know more than they learn: the hidden costs of single-use knowledge

Purpose To explore why organizations increasingly generate knowledge that supports immediate action but fails to contribute to sustained organizational learning. The article introduces the concept of single-use knowledge and examines how digitalization and artificial intelligence (AI) amplify the gap between knowledge creation and learning persistence. Design/methodology/approach The article develops a conceptual perspective informed by learning organization theory, autopoietic approaches to organizational learning and recent work on digitalization. It synthesizes these perspectives to explain how breaks in learning cycles can result in knowledge being used once but failing to become embedded within future organizational practice. Findings Organizations are becoming increasingly effective at generating knowledge but less effective at ensuring that knowledge remains alive through ongoing cycles of questioning, action and reflection. The article identifies single-use knowledge as a distinct learning challenge that emerges when knowledge is applied but not embedded. In digital environments, this process contributes to the accumulation of low-value information assets and digital residue. Research limitations/implications The article is conceptual and does not empirically test the proposed framework. Future research should examine the prevalence of single-use knowledge across different organizational contexts and explore methods for measuring learning persistence and knowledge reuse over time. Practical implications Leaders should focus less on knowledge creation and more on learning persistence. The article proposes a diagnostic framework to help organizations identify where learning breaks down and recommends measuring knowledge reuse, conducting learning reviews and assessing information assets according to their continuing learning value. Social implications As AI and digital technologies accelerate the production of information, organizations face growing challenges associated with storing and managing low-value digital assets. Improving learning persistence can reduce digital waste, support more sustainable information practices and contribute to wider digital decarbonization objectives. Originality/value The article introduces single-use knowledge as a new lens for understanding why organizations often know more than they learn. It extends learning organization thinking by linking learning persistence to digitalization and demonstrates how unrealized learning can create both organizational and environmental costs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Development in Learning Organizations An International Journal
Published
2026-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/dlo-06-2026-0331
Primary Topic
Organizational Learning and Leadership
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Organizations know more than they learn: the hidden costs of single-use knowledge

Tom Jackson (1258584), Ian Hodgkinson
Development in Learning Organizations An International Journal
Organizational Learning and Leadership
article

Organizations know more than they learn: the hidden costs of single-use knowledge

Tom Jackson (1258584), Ian Hodgkinson
article en

Abstract

Purpose To explore why organizations increasingly generate knowledge that supports immediate action but fails to contribute to sustained organizational learning. The article introduces the concept of single-use knowledge and examines how digitalization and artificial intelligence (AI) amplify the gap between knowledge creation and learning persistence. Design/methodology/approach The article develops a conceptual perspective informed by learning organization theory, autopoietic approaches to organizational learning and recent work on digitalization. It synthesizes these perspectives to explain how breaks in learning cycles can result in knowledge being used once but failing to become embedded within future organizational practice. Findings Organizations are becoming increasingly effective at generating knowledge but less effective at ensuring that knowledge remains alive through ongoing cycles of questioning, action and reflection. The article identifies single-use knowledge as a distinct learning challenge that emerges when knowledge is applied but not embedded. In digital environments, this process contributes to the accumulation of low-value information assets and digital residue. Research limitations/implications The article is conceptual and does not empirically test the proposed framework. Future research should examine the prevalence of single-use knowledge across different organizational contexts and explore methods for measuring learning persistence and knowledge reuse over time. Practical implications Leaders should focus less on knowledge creation and more on learning persistence. The article proposes a diagnostic framework to help organizations identify where learning breaks down and recommends measuring knowledge reuse, conducting learning reviews and assessing information assets according to their continuing learning value. Social implications As AI and digital technologies accelerate the production of information, organizations face growing challenges associated with storing and managing low-value digital assets. Improving learning persistence can reduce digital waste, support more sustainable information practices and contribute to wider digital decarbonization objectives. Originality/value The article introduces single-use knowledge as a new lens for understanding why organizations often know more than they learn. It extends learning organization thinking by linking learning persistence to digitalization and demonstrates how unrealized learning can create both organizational and environmental costs.

Development in Learning Organizations An International Journal
Loughborough University (GB), Loughborough College (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Organizational Learning and Leadership
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.