Using Method of Characteristics to Assess Reflected Oblique Shock Simulations

Abstract Oblique shock reflections occur in a variety of instances when a supersonic flow is compressed by a concave contact surface. These reflections can vary significantly in complexity depending on the initial Mach number of the planar shock, the number of facets on the contact surface, and their corresponding angles. Standard analyses of oblique shocks, such as shock polar analysis, provide only limited information for shocks over multi-faceted reflectors. Thus, it is necessary to explore and develop additional techniques to assess these types of problems. This exploratory study proposes and examines the utility of using the method of characteristics (MOC) as a physics-informed reference to test whether hydrodynamic code (hydrocode) solutions in smooth supersonic regions are consistent with a characteristic-based continuation of hydrocode-extracted upstream data. This technique will be applied to a single-wedge and double-wedge simulation to examine method-to-method discrepancies and refinement behavior. The resulting characteristic nets and summary metrics demonstrate that MOC can be useful for assessing consistency and refinement behavior in simulations of oblique shock reflections.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Verification Validation and Uncertainty Quantification
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4072721
Primary Topic
Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Using Method of Characteristics to Assess Reflected Oblique Shock Simulations

Jasper Thrussell, Jim Ferguson, Allyson Timko, Steven Anderson
Journal of Verification Validation and Uncertainty Quantification
Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
article

Using Method of Characteristics to Assess Reflected Oblique Shock Simulations

Jasper Thrussell, Jim Ferguson, Allyson Timko, Steven Anderson
article en

Abstract

Abstract Oblique shock reflections occur in a variety of instances when a supersonic flow is compressed by a concave contact surface. These reflections can vary significantly in complexity depending on the initial Mach number of the planar shock, the number of facets on the contact surface, and their corresponding angles. Standard analyses of oblique shocks, such as shock polar analysis, provide only limited information for shocks over multi-faceted reflectors. Thus, it is necessary to explore and develop additional techniques to assess these types of problems. This exploratory study proposes and examines the utility of using the method of characteristics (MOC) as a physics-informed reference to test whether hydrodynamic code (hydrocode) solutions in smooth supersonic regions are consistent with a characteristic-based continuation of hydrocode-extracted upstream data. This technique will be applied to a single-wedge and double-wedge simulation to examine method-to-method discrepancies and refinement behavior. The resulting characteristic nets and summary metrics demonstrate that MOC can be useful for assessing consistency and refinement behavior in simulations of oblique shock reflections.

Journal of Verification Validation and Uncertainty Quantification
Los Alamos National Laboratory (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Using Method of Characteristics to Assess Reflected Oblique Shock Simulations — Jasper Thrussell, Jim Ferguson, et al. · Journal of Verification Validation and Uncertainty Quantification (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS