Dynamic attribute activation explains gaze biases in choice

People tend to choose the options they look at more. Prior work explains this effect by assuming that visual attention increases preference for the attended option. However, it remains unclear why looking at an option increases its preference and when this relationship is weakened. Using an experimental paradigm that combines eye-tracking and a think-aloud protocol, we provide evidence that visual attention shapes preference by activating attributes associated with the attended option. Critically, the content of these activated attributes depends on contextual factors such as stimulus desirability and behavioral goals. In standard choice settings, where the goal is to choose the preferred option, visual attention primarily activates positive attributes. In contrast, when these contextual factors are incongruent, activated attributes become less positive, reducing the influence of visual attention on choice. To account for these patterns, we propose a computational model of gaze-driven attribute activation. Our model subsumes existing theories as special cases, and uniquely predicts which attributes are brought to mind by gaze and how they shape downstream decisions. Together, our work offers a mechanistic explanation of a fundamental driver of choice as well as its boundary conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2603674123
Primary Topic
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Dynamic attribute activation explains gaze biases in choice

Xiaozhi Taro Yang, Sudeep Bhatia
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
article

Dynamic attribute activation explains gaze biases in choice

Xiaozhi Taro Yang, Sudeep Bhatia
article en

Abstract

People tend to choose the options they look at more. Prior work explains this effect by assuming that visual attention increases preference for the attended option. However, it remains unclear why looking at an option increases its preference and when this relationship is weakened. Using an experimental paradigm that combines eye-tracking and a think-aloud protocol, we provide evidence that visual attention shapes preference by activating attributes associated with the attended option. Critically, the content of these activated attributes depends on contextual factors such as stimulus desirability and behavioral goals. In standard choice settings, where the goal is to choose the preferred option, visual attention primarily activates positive attributes. In contrast, when these contextual factors are incongruent, activated attributes become less positive, reducing the influence of visual attention on choice. To account for these patterns, we propose a computational model of gaze-driven attribute activation. Our model subsumes existing theories as special cases, and uniquely predicts which attributes are brought to mind by gaze and how they shape downstream decisions. Together, our work offers a mechanistic explanation of a fundamental driver of choice as well as its boundary conditions.

Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesVol. 123(39)
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Dynamic attribute activation explains gaze biases in choice — Xiaozhi Taro Yang, Sudeep Bhatia · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS