Efficacy and safety of sphenopalatine ganglion pulsed radiofrequency in episodic cluster headache: a randomized controlled trial

This multicenter, randomized, controlled, blinded-endpoint trial aimed to assess the efficacy of pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) targeting the sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) as an add-on to verapamil for the treatment of episodic cluster headache (ECH). Eligible participants with a history of ECH who presented to a pain clinic within 5 days after the onset of a cluster period were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive PRF (PRF group) or nerve block (NB group) targeting the SPG. All participants received oral verapamil (360 mg/day) after the procedure. The primary endpoint was cluster-period duration. Secondary endpoints included pain intensity during attacks, assessed using the numerical rating scale (NRS); attack frequency; attack duration; and rizatriptan use at day 1, day 3, week 1, week 2, month 1, month 3, month 6, and year 1 after treatment. Eighty participants were randomly assigned to the PRF group (n = 40) or the NB group (n = 40). Median cluster-period duration was 15.0 days (interquartile range [IQR], 6.2–30.0) in the PRF group and 61.0 days (IQR, 17.0–90.0) in the NB group. PRF was superior to NB in reducing cluster-period duration (median difference, -34.0 days; 95% confidence interval [CI], -56.0 to -17.0; P < 0.001). NRS scores during attacks, attack frequency, attack duration, and rizatriptan use at week 1, week 2, month 1, and month 3 were significantly lower in the PRF group than in the NB group (P < 0.05). The median between-group differences in NRS scores at day 3, week 1, week 2, and month 1 were -1.0, -2.0, -3.0, and -4.0 points, respectively. In patients with ECH resistant to oral medications, SPG-PRF plus verapamil provided greater pain relief than SPG-NB plus verapamil, with few adverse effects. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03567590

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medicine
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-026-05242-8
Primary Topic
Migraine and Headache Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Efficacy and safety of sphenopalatine ganglion pulsed radiofrequency in episodic cluster headache: a randomized controlled trial

Chunmei Zhao, Jiajia Bian, BAOGUO WANG, Lan Meng et al.
BMC Medicine
Migraine and Headache Studies
article

Efficacy and safety of sphenopalatine ganglion pulsed radiofrequency in episodic cluster headache: a randomized controlled trial

Chunmei Zhao, Jiajia Bian, BAOGUO WANG, Lan Meng, Hao Ren, Dasheng Wu, Ying Shen, Fang Luo, Niti Shrestha
article en

Abstract

This multicenter, randomized, controlled, blinded-endpoint trial aimed to assess the efficacy of pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) targeting the sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) as an add-on to verapamil for the treatment of episodic cluster headache (ECH). Eligible participants with a history of ECH who presented to a pain clinic within 5 days after the onset of a cluster period were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive PRF (PRF group) or nerve block (NB group) targeting the SPG. All participants received oral verapamil (360 mg/day) after the procedure. The primary endpoint was cluster-period duration. Secondary endpoints included pain intensity during attacks, assessed using the numerical rating scale (NRS); attack frequency; attack duration; and rizatriptan use at day 1, day 3, week 1, week 2, month 1, month 3, month 6, and year 1 after treatment. Eighty participants were randomly assigned to the PRF group (n = 40) or the NB group (n = 40). Median cluster-period duration was 15.0 days (interquartile range [IQR], 6.2–30.0) in the PRF group and 61.0 days (IQR, 17.0–90.0) in the NB group. PRF was superior to NB in reducing cluster-period duration (median difference, -34.0 days; 95% confidence interval [CI], -56.0 to -17.0; P < 0.001). NRS scores during attacks, attack frequency, attack duration, and rizatriptan use at week 1, week 2, month 1, and month 3 were significantly lower in the PRF group than in the NB group (P < 0.05). The median between-group differences in NRS scores at day 3, week 1, week 2, and month 1 were -1.0, -2.0, -3.0, and -4.0 points, respectively. In patients with ECH resistant to oral medications, SPG-PRF plus verapamil provided greater pain relief than SPG-NB plus verapamil, with few adverse effects. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03567590

BMC Medicine
Capital Medical University (CN), Bir Hospital (NP), Beijing Tian Tan Hospital (CN), People 's Hospital of Jilin Province (CN), Beijing Sanbo Brain Hospital (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Migraine and Headache Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.