Linking Environmental Antimicrobial Resistance to Human Health: Pathways, Co‐Selective Pressures and Attribution Gaps

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is recognised as a significant global health threat, yet research, surveillance and intervention strategies remain largely focused on clinical and veterinary settings, with limited attention to environmental reservoirs and transmission pathways. Growing global evidence, including from Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ), points to a clear link between dominant sources of AMR entering the environment (such as wastewater) and its dissemination in receiving environments. Once in these environments, a wide range of microorganisms, both environmental and introduced, interact in complex ways, with their associated resistomes contributing to potential human exposure pathways. However, clear attribution of environmental AMR contributions to human (and animal) health outcomes remains limited and represents a critical next step for research and surveillance. This viewpoint highlights global and regional evidence on environmental contributions to AMR transmission and dissemination, with emphasis on co‐selective pressures including antibiotics, heavy metals, biocides and plastics that promote resistance selection, persistence and horizontal gene transfer. We identify key gaps in NZ, notably the lack of integrated, cross‐sector monitoring, robust attribution approaches and quantitative assessment of risks to human health. We conclude that effective mitigation requires integrated cross‐sector frameworks linking environmental surveillance, genomic data, microbial source attribution and quantitative risk assessment to inform targeted, risk‐based interventions. These interventions need to be based on a deeper understanding of the interactions between environmental reservoirs, co‐selective pressures and the key drivers and pathways of AMR, including broader environmental influences such as co‐contaminants and climate change.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/snz2.70085
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Linking Environmental Antimicrobial Resistance to Human Health: Pathways, Co‐Selective Pressures and Attribution Gaps

Louise Weaver, Annette Bolton, Angela Baschieri, Sarah Nelson et al.
Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand
Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
article

Linking Environmental Antimicrobial Resistance to Human Health: Pathways, Co‐Selective Pressures and Attribution Gaps

Louise Weaver, Annette Bolton, Angela Baschieri, Sarah Nelson, Isabelle Pattis
article en

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is recognised as a significant global health threat, yet research, surveillance and intervention strategies remain largely focused on clinical and veterinary settings, with limited attention to environmental reservoirs and transmission pathways. Growing global evidence, including from Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ), points to a clear link between dominant sources of AMR entering the environment (such as wastewater) and its dissemination in receiving environments. Once in these environments, a wide range of microorganisms, both environmental and introduced, interact in complex ways, with their associated resistomes contributing to potential human exposure pathways. However, clear attribution of environmental AMR contributions to human (and animal) health outcomes remains limited and represents a critical next step for research and surveillance. This viewpoint highlights global and regional evidence on environmental contributions to AMR transmission and dissemination, with emphasis on co‐selective pressures including antibiotics, heavy metals, biocides and plastics that promote resistance selection, persistence and horizontal gene transfer. We identify key gaps in NZ, notably the lack of integrated, cross‐sector monitoring, robust attribution approaches and quantitative assessment of risks to human health. We conclude that effective mitigation requires integrated cross‐sector frameworks linking environmental surveillance, genomic data, microbial source attribution and quantitative risk assessment to inform targeted, risk‐based interventions. These interventions need to be based on a deeper understanding of the interactions between environmental reservoirs, co‐selective pressures and the key drivers and pathways of AMR, including broader environmental influences such as co‐contaminants and climate change.

Journal of the Royal Society of New ZealandVol. 56(5)
New Zealand Brain Research Institute (NZ), Auckland District Health Board (NZ), New Zealand Institute for Public Health and Forensic Science (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.