Reevaluation of the Bayesian network model to support immunotherapy decision-making in recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Abstract Purpose Recurrent and metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (RM-HNSCC) is a challenging malignant disease due to limited treatment options and heterogeneous therapeutic responses. Despite Immunotherapy with PD-1 inhibitors such as Nivolumab and Pembrolizumab has become a standard of care, it is still complex and multifactorial to make a clinical decision in giving the patient its best individualized therapy. This study refines the use of Bayesian networks (BN) in application of supporting therapy selection in RM-HNSCC, integrating clinical, pathological, and molecular features. Methods The previously introduced immune-oncologic BN for head and neck cancer was rechallenged by clinical data from 82 patients with RM-HNSCC. Therapy decisions (Nivolumab vs. Pembrolizumab) were calculated from the primary patient data. Model performance was assessed by comparing predicted versus actual therapy using retrospective data. Results The reevaluation of the immune-oncologic BN revealed an inconsistency in the conditional probabilities of the initial model leading to a correction. Consequently, the model achieved 94.7% predictive accuracy for Nivolumab administration (18/19 cases) and 95.2% (60/63) for Pembrolizumab, yielding an overall prediction accuracy of 95.1% with a Cohens Kappa of 0.859. The model provided transparent reasoning paths for therapy selection and enabled hypothetical simulations in clinical scenarios. Conclusion The immune-oncologic BN offers a promising approach to enhance personalized immunotherapy selection in RM-HNSCC patients by integrating diverse clinical variables into an interpretable decision support framework. The results support further prospective validation and clinical integration. Given the increasing complexity of biomarker-driven therapy, probabilistic models may contribute to more consistent and evidence-aligned treatment decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-026-03803-z
Primary Topic
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Reevaluation of the Bayesian network model to support immunotherapy decision-making in recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Jan Gaebel, Matthaeus Stoehr, Andreas Dietz, Johannes Stoehr
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
article

Reevaluation of the Bayesian network model to support immunotherapy decision-making in recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Jan Gaebel, Matthaeus Stoehr, Andreas Dietz, Johannes Stoehr
article en

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Recurrent and metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (RM-HNSCC) is a challenging malignant disease due to limited treatment options and heterogeneous therapeutic responses. Despite Immunotherapy with PD-1 inhibitors such as Nivolumab and Pembrolizumab has become a standard of care, it is still complex and multifactorial to make a clinical decision in giving the patient its best individualized therapy. This study refines the use of Bayesian networks (BN) in application of supporting therapy selection in RM-HNSCC, integrating clinical, pathological, and molecular features. Methods The previously introduced immune-oncologic BN for head and neck cancer was rechallenged by clinical data from 82 patients with RM-HNSCC. Therapy decisions (Nivolumab vs. Pembrolizumab) were calculated from the primary patient data. Model performance was assessed by comparing predicted versus actual therapy using retrospective data. Results The reevaluation of the immune-oncologic BN revealed an inconsistency in the conditional probabilities of the initial model leading to a correction. Consequently, the model achieved 94.7% predictive accuracy for Nivolumab administration (18/19 cases) and 95.2% (60/63) for Pembrolizumab, yielding an overall prediction accuracy of 95.1% with a Cohens Kappa of 0.859. The model provided transparent reasoning paths for therapy selection and enabled hypothetical simulations in clinical scenarios. Conclusion The immune-oncologic BN offers a promising approach to enhance personalized immunotherapy selection in RM-HNSCC patients by integrating diverse clinical variables into an interpretable decision support framework. The results support further prospective validation and clinical integration. Given the increasing complexity of biomarker-driven therapy, probabilistic models may contribute to more consistent and evidence-aligned treatment decisions.

International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
Leipzig University of Applied Sciences (DE), University Hospital Leipzig (DE), Leipzig University (DE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.