Assessment of Perception and Utilization of Artificial Intelligence Tools Among Health Information Management Practioners in Tertiary Hospitals in Bayelsa State

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly transforming healthcare through automated data processing, intelligent information management, predictive analytics and decision support. However, effective integration of AI into Health Information Management (HIM) depends largely on healthcare workers’ awareness, perceptions, competencies and actual utilization of AI tools. This study assessed the perception and utilization of AI tools among healthcare workers in tertiary hospitals in Bayelsa State, Nigeria. A descriptive cross-sectional research design was adopted. The study was conducted among 112 healthcare workers in selected tertiary hospitals in Bayelsa State. Data were collected using a structured self-administered questionnaire and analysed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) Version 27. Descriptive statistics comprising frequency, percentage, mean and standard deviation were used, while inferential statistics, including independent samples t-test and Pearson Product Moment Correlation, were employed at the 0.05 level of significance. The findings revealed a low level of awareness of AI tools among respondents, with a grand mean of 2.43. Perception of the usefulness of AI tools in HIM practices were also low (x̄ = 2.48), indicating limited confidence in their overall usefulness. However, the level of AI utilization was moderate (x̄ = 2.52), suggesting that AI tools were being used to some extent but had not been fully integrated into routine HIM practices. Significant differences were found between healthcare workers in Federal and State hospitals in terms of awareness, perception, utilization and challenges, with Federal healthcare workers generally reporting more favourable outcomes. Furthermore, a strong positive and statistically significant relationship was found between perception of AI tools and utilization (r = 0.62, p < 0.001), resulting in the rejection of the null hypothesis. The study concluded that AI adoption in HIM practices in tertiary hospitals in Bayelsa State remained suboptimal due to gaps in awareness, skills, training, institutional support and infrastructure. It recommended sustained AI training and capacity building, improved digital infrastructure, institutional support, clear governance frameworks and interventions aimed at improving healthcare workers’ confidence and positive perception of AI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International journal of medical science and pharmaceutical research.
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22963047
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Assessment of Perception and Utilization of Artificial Intelligence Tools Among Health Information Management Practioners in Tertiary Hospitals in Bayelsa State

MESHACH GBAYE, Dogiye Lucky Ebiteinye
International journal of medical science and pharmaceutical research.
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Assessment of Perception and Utilization of Artificial Intelligence Tools Among Health Information Management Practioners in Tertiary Hospitals in Bayelsa State

MESHACH GBAYE, Dogiye Lucky Ebiteinye
article en

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly transforming healthcare through automated data processing, intelligent information management, predictive analytics and decision support. However, effective integration of AI into Health Information Management (HIM) depends largely on healthcare workers’ awareness, perceptions, competencies and actual utilization of AI tools. This study assessed the perception and utilization of AI tools among healthcare workers in tertiary hospitals in Bayelsa State, Nigeria. A descriptive cross-sectional research design was adopted. The study was conducted among 112 healthcare workers in selected tertiary hospitals in Bayelsa State. Data were collected using a structured self-administered questionnaire and analysed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) Version 27. Descriptive statistics comprising frequency, percentage, mean and standard deviation were used, while inferential statistics, including independent samples t-test and Pearson Product Moment Correlation, were employed at the 0.05 level of significance. The findings revealed a low level of awareness of AI tools among respondents, with a grand mean of 2.43. Perception of the usefulness of AI tools in HIM practices were also low (x̄ = 2.48), indicating limited confidence in their overall usefulness. However, the level of AI utilization was moderate (x̄ = 2.52), suggesting that AI tools were being used to some extent but had not been fully integrated into routine HIM practices. Significant differences were found between healthcare workers in Federal and State hospitals in terms of awareness, perception, utilization and challenges, with Federal healthcare workers generally reporting more favourable outcomes. Furthermore, a strong positive and statistically significant relationship was found between perception of AI tools and utilization (r = 0.62, p < 0.001), resulting in the rejection of the null hypothesis. The study concluded that AI adoption in HIM practices in tertiary hospitals in Bayelsa State remained suboptimal due to gaps in awareness, skills, training, institutional support and infrastructure. It recommended sustained AI training and capacity building, improved digital infrastructure, institutional support, clear governance frameworks and interventions aimed at improving healthcare workers’ confidence and positive perception of AI.

International journal of medical science and pharmaceutical research.
Federal University Otuoke (NG)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.