Generative AI Utilization and Perspectives Among Reproductive‐Age Women with Systemic Autoimmune and Rheumatic Diseases

OBJECTIVE: Reproductive-age women with systemic autoimmune and rheumatic diseases (SARDs) have unique information needs related to their SARDs and reproductive health. We sought to understand their use of and receptivity to current and hypothetical generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools for health information-seeking. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of women ages 18-48 with diverse SARDs who were enrolled in a research registry. Descriptive statistics, exploratory multivariable ordinal logistic regression, and thematic analysis were used to evaluate responses. RESULTS: Of 270 eligible women, 190 completed the survey. Participants had an average age of 34.1 (S.D. 6.4) years. Most were familiar with generative AI (77.4%) and nearly 90% perceived that it might benefit healthcare; however, only 29% had used it to answer health questions. Eighty-eight percent were willing to use a physician-recommended AI tool. Interest in a hypothetical generative AI tool for SARDs management was associated with desire for personalized recommendations (OR 2.89, CI: 1.25-6.67). Approximately one-third expressed interest in using generative AI for information about medication safety during pregnancy or lactation, which was associated with younger age (OR 0.93, CI: 0.88-0.99), desire for timely access (OR 4.71, CI: 2.07-10.71), and increased information access (OR 2.56, CI: 1.20-5.43). In qualitative analysis, participants viewed generative AI as adjunctive to-not a replacement for-physician guidance. CONCLUSION: Participants expressed interest in using generative AI for health information-seeking, but preferred tools endorsed by rheumatologists. A generative AI tool co-developed with rheumatologists and adjunctive to the patient-physician relationship could address information needs in this population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Arthritis Care & Research
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.80168
Primary Topic
Pregnancy and Medication Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Generative AI Utilization and Perspectives Among Reproductive‐Age Women with Systemic Autoimmune and Rheumatic Diseases

Mehret Birru Talabi, Samantha Rodriguez, Catherine Wright, Mariam Arif et al.
Arthritis Care & Research
Pregnancy and Medication Impact
article

Generative AI Utilization and Perspectives Among Reproductive‐Age Women with Systemic Autoimmune and Rheumatic Diseases

Mehret Birru Talabi, Samantha Rodriguez, Catherine Wright, Mariam Arif, Sarah Graves, Tamar Krishnamurti
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Reproductive-age women with systemic autoimmune and rheumatic diseases (SARDs) have unique information needs related to their SARDs and reproductive health. We sought to understand their use of and receptivity to current and hypothetical generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools for health information-seeking. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of women ages 18-48 with diverse SARDs who were enrolled in a research registry. Descriptive statistics, exploratory multivariable ordinal logistic regression, and thematic analysis were used to evaluate responses. RESULTS: Of 270 eligible women, 190 completed the survey. Participants had an average age of 34.1 (S.D. 6.4) years. Most were familiar with generative AI (77.4%) and nearly 90% perceived that it might benefit healthcare; however, only 29% had used it to answer health questions. Eighty-eight percent were willing to use a physician-recommended AI tool. Interest in a hypothetical generative AI tool for SARDs management was associated with desire for personalized recommendations (OR 2.89, CI: 1.25-6.67). Approximately one-third expressed interest in using generative AI for information about medication safety during pregnancy or lactation, which was associated with younger age (OR 0.93, CI: 0.88-0.99), desire for timely access (OR 4.71, CI: 2.07-10.71), and increased information access (OR 2.56, CI: 1.20-5.43). In qualitative analysis, participants viewed generative AI as adjunctive to-not a replacement for-physician guidance. CONCLUSION: Participants expressed interest in using generative AI for health information-seeking, but preferred tools endorsed by rheumatologists. A generative AI tool co-developed with rheumatologists and adjunctive to the patient-physician relationship could address information needs in this population.

Arthritis Care & Research
University of Pittsburgh (US), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Pregnancy and Medication Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.